• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Gen-X, having lived through 1987 (Black Monday), ~2000 Dot-Com Bubble burst , 2008 global financial meltdown, and the 2020 COVID-19 crash:

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Neither did the vast majority of Gen-X. The cocaine 80’s is peak Boomer shit.

        EDIT: I was born in 73. Started uni in 90. Let’s say you wanted to ride that mid 80’s wave, you should have been in the workforce by 84, that puts you born ~63. By the majority of lists, Gen-X starts on 65.

        • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah. I went to school with rich kids who were suddenly worried about whether daddy could pay for college after that 1987 crash.

          • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Yeah, 1988-1996 was pretty bad. It was my computer hobby that saved my life. No idea where I’d be today had I not turned my side hustle into a career.

            • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I guess I was “lucky” in that I was too poor to be directly impacted my the market back then. But I was young, energetic and at my peak looks-wise, so I can’t shit on that era too much.

        • 13igtyme@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Many kids had part time jobs in highschool. Plus that still directly impacted kids graduating into a good vs bad economy. Younger Gen x, sure. But it still benefits older and mid Gen x.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Most of us were coming of age in the 80s and working at a grocery store if at all.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      7 hours ago

      True, but as what happend in the dot com bubble, the middle and lower classes will pay. If you lived in a tech area during the bubble burst then, you’ll know how bad this is going to be worldwide.

      • raldone01@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        So what to do if I suspect a bubble is coming? Sell my investment funds and keep fiat? Buy gold? Buy merchandise to sell later? Buy real estate?

        I have no idea how to prepare.

        • jarmitage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Unless you’re retiring in the next 5-10 years, it’s probably best to stand pat or shift some % out of large-cap funds to mid-caps. But the old adage usually holds true: “time in the market beats timing the market.” In other words, pulling it all out is way harder to get right than just leaving it in.

          (Your choice- I am not a financial advisor)

        • Goodeye8@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Depends how wealthy you are. If you’re wealthy and even remotely intelligent this is where you make even more money. Wealthy people will diversify, they’ll sell some of their tech stocks and put it into anything not related to AI. Be it oil or manufacturing or agriculture etc. Then they liquidate those stocks (or loan against them, depending on how wealthy we’re talking about) to buy up tech stock when they’ve crashed. You then wait a few years and make money.

          If you’re not wealthy enough to do that put your money into something stable, like bonds. If you want to be sure you won’t lose money (in the sense that the amount of money you put in won’t go below what you put in, it can still lose value due to inflation) your bank probably offers term deposits where you let your bank reserve your money for a few years and in return they guarantee something like a 2% annual return on your deposit.

          And if you’re not wealthy enough to do that… You’re pretty much fucked. Learn to cook and enjoy cheap meals, start budgeting right now, forget enjoyment and hope you don’t get fired.

        • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If you see risk being very high, make low risk investments: high yield savings accounts, CDs, bonds.

            • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 hours ago

              On the real, I’ve heard the used CD market is making a massive comeback. There’s something to be said about physical media in the age of internet becoming more and more scary.

        • anonymouspl@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Not financial advise but I personally decided to keep my money in MSCI World ex USA ETFand some gold + Stoxx 600. For now it seems my strategy is working. Will see where we go from here

      • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Ohh absolutely, it was devastating to watch, and then to see corporations being bailed out because they were too big to fail. The big question is, is this really the start of a serious crash where the circle jerk of circular money pumped between 4-5 megacorps comes to an end, or do things really go crashing down from here. You need sanity to stabilize…the nuts have spun off the lugs that were holding the wheels of the economy to the hub…i think one wheel just wobbled a little…

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There won’t be an AI bailout as with the auto industry and banking. AI hate is bipartisan and no national-level politician is dumb enough to throw public money at them. They’re not a huge employment/manufacturing concern like autos and they’re not the backbone of our financial system.

          (And once again, I love your lug nut analogy, spot on!)

          • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Greetings again 👋

            Yah I agree, I don’t think it will be a traditional bailout like the auto industry though which was forgivable loans, I think it’ll likely come in the form of additional stock purchases by the US government, which is wild when you think about it.

            They’re not a huge employment/manufacturing concern like autos and they’re not the backbone of our financial system.

            No but they (AI companies and those claiming to be one including chip companies) directly influence the stock market, and this administration is having its day manipulating the hell out of it making a ton of money along the way. So if there is a way for the to make money on it, it will absolutely happen. Also the chip companies have national defense interests and so it’ a similar scenario as the DOD’s mission can not ever be hampered lol. The line must go up lol.

            Ha! And thank you.

          • OwOarchist@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            AI hate is bipartisan and no national-level politician is dumb enough to throw public money at them.

            Trump loves him some AI bros, though. And could easily “justify” dumping shitloads of public money into them because using AI in the military (bad idea in the first place) makes AI a “national security priority”.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              51 minutes ago

              Trump can’t spend that kind of money. Despite Congress bowing to him, they still hold the power of the purse.

              • OwOarchist@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                44 minutes ago

                If they actually opt to use it. Which is a big fat fucking if.

                Also, Trump might just steal it from somewhere. (Where has all that Venezuelan oil money gone?) And who’s going to stop him? The Supreme Court has already ruled that he can do basically anything he wants.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I hope you’re not excited for that to happen is what I’m saying. Even if you’re not American, you will feel this.

          • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Ohh absolutely not excited at all. Its a pending shitshow…I didn’t vote for any of this and have already cast my vote to have all these idiots removed from office.

  • Nøkkelost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Damn, my retirement fund is gonna look like shit the next few years but It’s over 3 decades until I’m gonna touch that money so I guess I’m fine. Not sure I wanna try to time the market and put it all into bonds for the next 1-5 years until the actual burst shows up. (It’s 85% global index)

    Good thing the majority of my regular savings is in bonds and high-yield saving accounts.

    • workerONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It’s only down like 1% from last week. I wouldn’t change anything unless you can’t sleep at night. Could have an AI bubble pop like 30% of the market but I would expect it to eventually recover. I personally prefer not to worry so don’t have much in stocks compared to most people who have retirement accounts

  • P1nkman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    So should I withdraw whatever i have in technology index funds, while I have the gains?

    • David J. Atkinson@c.im
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      @P1nkman It depends. There is no universal answer.

      About two months ago I read a very astute article about this circular, excessive financing in data centers and chips and thought, “here we go again.” Cashing out locks in your losses. That was my mistake in the last tech bubble. This one is set to be worse. This time around, I’m much more diversified and my personal answer is “no.” I moved about 10% of my tech funds into low-risk investments and the rest I will let ride. It may take years for recovery, but I can wait.

      If you think you will need that money in the next few years, you might consider taking at least your profits now, maybe more. If your investments are in your retirement account then you also have to reckon your potential tax liability now versus later.

    • UnpoppedCorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If you have a place to park it that will earn more or lose less, definitely. Putting into cash will lose at least 3% per year.

      • P1nkman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m thinking withdraw my gains, wait for the crash, buy in again? Damn, it’s a gamble…

        • UnpoppedCorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Timing the market usually fails. Dollar cost averaging can give you a small advantage.

          Assuming that AI follows a similar path as the .com boom… A lot of companies will go under leaving a few companies who will benefit greatly. It’s not that AI is going away. We’re just pruning the dead wood.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The AI bubble won’t be a typical dip. Some, maybe most, of these companies will be wiped out. No idea as to who crawls out the blast crater, but there will be survivors.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        My uneducated and impoverished thought is cash will buy you real estate which is about to get really cheap, whereas any stock you buy today is going to have a severe crash very soon.

        But most of my investments are in beans: i’ve got jars or black, red, garbanzos, kidney, and navy beans; also a variety of lentils.

        • UnpoppedCorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Real estate has the potential to be cheap in 20 years as the baby boomers die leaving smaller generations to buy their larger number of homes.

          Any kind of asset can be a good investment. If you have a place to store it, classic cars only go up in price and some of them are under 10K. Bonus: you get to drive them. I know someone whose 401k is mostly collectable guns (rare, 100+ years old guns). You just need to choose something with lasting value. Don’t repeat the Beanie Baby crash.

    • nocturne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I bought 30 AMD stocks for $13 a pop almost 10 years ago. Last month I sold 5 for $3200 (~$640 each) today they are about $500 each. Really wishing I had sold all of them.

    • concrete_baby@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Depends on your risk profile. But if you look at the growing capex and consecutive negative free cash flow of big tech, it is a sign of worry if you are only investing short term or you do swing trades.

    • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      In theory you could short Microsoft, NVidia, etc. but the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent, so even though those stock prices are a crack fueled fever dream, betting against them is likely gonna be a trip to the poor house. I saw someone on here recommend some funds that are mostly large cap, traditional companies (read, not big tech) and some bond funds. I was going to research his recs today and see if it would make sense to move some money out of the S&P 500 index fund that I lean on way too much (of couse, it would have been better if I considered this a week ago 🤦🏾).

      Lemme see if I can dig up that post…

      Hopefully this link works, I’m using Voyager and haven’t figured out how to link posts https://lemmy.world/comment/26583022