Except the swing states, which almost all had record turnout.
Except the swing states, which almost all had record turnout.
The election once again crushed popular Democrat talking points. Republicans can win the popular election, good turnout isn’t a bad thing for Republicans, and spending more leads to winning.
It would have won the popular vote, which many on Lemmy are far more concerned about than who wins or loses overall.
You’re just as bad as the stop the steal trumpers when you ignore the election. You need to accept the loss, you don’t have to just go back to doing nothing though. You can work to recruit voters to your side for the next 4 years instead of just the few months before.
I really hope that guy isn’t allowed to bet on games.
The market is people wanting a vacation experience of being on a train.
Seven hours is still way worse than flying though.
You can do new York to San Francisco, LA is overrated anyway.
Is it not possible to just run in a circle endlessly in the game?
The popular vote has been the moral victory of the Democrat party since 2000.
Michigan voted trump and a Democrat woman, slotkin, senator this election.
Imagine the blown minds of future pows when they get better rations as a prisoner.
Jungle primaries are great to reduce the power of nonmajority parties. If you have a primary with 4 Democrat and 4 Republican candidates, the winners will tend to be the 4 from the majority party as all votes get split relatively even. This leaves the minority party with no candidate in the general election.
Yes a question about Hitler being good overall is far better. Attempting to shove him into an all bad category is just dishonest and allows opponents a free win. The good absolutely should matter, because painting people as all one thing isn’t accurate and makes understanding how things happen more difficult.
NBC is doing that too. They called a bunch of Trump States the second polls closed, but are pretending new York is still up in the air.
What’s more iconic than Mordor?
This is a good example of why redistricting is hard. Is it fair to intentionally distort things to make majority minority districts? Is it actually distorting to have no majority minority districts? Is discrimination ok when used for what’s believed to be positive, or is the act of discrimination always bad? There’s also the fairly racist assumption that the only chance a minority candidate has is in a majority minority district.
There also the weird idiosyncrasy where a handful of states were justifiably labeled as extra racist and deserve extra scrutiny. There isn’t a way to add or remove state from the list though. This has allowed states not on the list to become just as or more racist and not be subjected to scrutiny.
For people that get to work from home or work off shifts and sleep in the day they are annoyingly loud, and seem like they are in constant use due to everyone doing yard work at different times.
Politics is a weird incestuous profession where references and endorsement matters more. All the high level staffers need that good reference to get their next job.