Did… did I just slide to a parallel universe? Do I get to meet Jerry O’Connell? What the hell is going on?!

  • icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I’m wondering if we’re in the process of seeing the parties flip tbh. It seems like D’s are becoming more conservative and R’s are now trying to make systemic changes. Granted it’s not a perfect flip and R-progressiveness is more like going backwards at times (abortion) but things feel weird now.

    • D: Trying to maintain (aka conserve) the status quo. Haven’t been truly progressive for decades. Doesn’t seem to have learned anything from losing in 2024.
    • R: Got suddenly forced into populism by Trump’s surprise win and staying power. Their status quo rich politicians are all being forced out. “Anti-Elites” and big chaotic changes are now their calling cards.

    If R’s realize that voters will strongly support them for attacking the rich, it might happen imo.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Bannon is the cackling villain.

      He knows the system is fucked. He knows he’s fucked. He knows you know it’s fucked and there’s no reason to hide anything.

      If Starscream slicked his hair back and had a thing for Johnny Cash’s wardrobe, you’d have something close to Bannon.

      • logos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        …some men aren’t looking for anything logical, like money. They can’t be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This is a 1932-type realignment, if we do this right

    Guys, he’s not talking about the re-alignment in America in 1932…

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This reminds me of a manifesto I was reading for a proposed proletarian-run state. Comes from early 1900s, before the world went to shit because of the rise of fadcism. Particularly a few key points from their 25-point plan stood out to me:

    1. Abolition of unearned incomes [passive income, in today’s terms]. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery.
    1. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice of life and property that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment due to a war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. Therefore, we demand ruthless confiscation of all war profits.
    1. We demand nationalization of all businesses which have been up to the present formed into companies (trusts).
    1. We demand that the profits from wholesale trade shall be shared out.
    1. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.
    1. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.
    1. We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free expropriation of land for the purposes of public utility, abolition of land rent and prevention of all speculation in land.
    1. We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, profiteers and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.

    […]

    1. The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious citizen to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. […] We demand the education at the expense of the state of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.
    1. The state is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, […]

    Oops, wait, that’s excerpted from The National Socialist Program

    Yeah, it turns out Nazis have always been willing to use socialist rhetoric to appeal to the working class. They know what they’re doing, but it’s only a matter of time before what’s determined to be for “the good of the workers” is coincidentally aligned with genocide and war and the greed of the ruling class…

    TL;DR Nazis were always on board with taxing the rich… Until they didn’t have any more competition, at which point it’s back to oligarchy (and genocide, lots and lots of genocide).

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I was wondering with a few of those. Particularly number 18 is dropping fucking anvil sized hints. And knowing what to look for the rest fall neatly into line with their position against reparations and American government loans; their stance on veteran’s care; and their conspiracy that corporations cost them world war 1, (this handily turned into Jews the second they needed corporate money).

      So yeah I guess what I’m saying is you should definitely look the gift horse in the mouth. I learned this lesson as a kid in the 90’s watching Newt Gingrich talk about how we need to do more to help poverty stricken and homeless children. I was nodding right along and then he got to his solution, workhouses. He even used an updated “Dignity of Work” line about how they’ll learn useful skills and be proud of themselves.

    • meliaesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Why are you reading Nazi manifestos? Most of those bullet points look terrible either way though.

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Because I believe in learning from the past, and not making information forbidden either formally via regulations, nor informally via social pressures.

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bannon is an anger salesmen. Anger salesmen don’t sell you somene else’s anger, though – they can’t. Instead, they package up your own anger, and sell it back to you.

    Bannon sees the the reaction people are habing to CEOs right now, slapping a big ol’ bow on it, and selling it back to people.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    "This is a 1932-type realignment, if we do this right,” Bannon explained. “Look at the demographics that got us here – black, Hispanic, white, working class, all of it. If we deliver for these people, and I mean deliver in a big way economically, then this is a coalition that could last for 50 years.”

    He added that loyalty to “crony capitalism” and “tax breaks for the corporations” could “squander” a unique moment in history.

    Making the economy better is how Hitler got into power too. The irony in saying this could be a 1932 style realignment is not lost on me. Trump has also said he wants to go after his political opponents and put them in prison. Also something Hitler did.

    • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      109
      ·
      1 day ago

      To expand on this for the unaware: Hitler came back into power for his second term in 1932. His first term, similar to trumps, was rife with turmoil and political/administrative blunders. One of the first things he did, upon returning to power, was a German version of The New Deal. They massively invested in their country’s infrastructure and provided tens of millions of jobs for the young working class, who had been suffering the worst unemployment crisis in an age. For the first time in their lives, young Germans had good jobs (with great benefits) and were contributing towards building a better, cleaner, safer Germany, all facilitated by “the national socialist party”. This was the part of nazi history that actually included socialism, and it’s how the nazi party duped an entire generation into becoming their foot soldiers. They actually delivered substantive, positive change for the people, allowed people to get comfortable with the new status quo while they further built propaganda machines, then turned that status quo into a carrot on a stick. Young nazi’s were very fearful of a backslide, so when nazi propaganda started saying all these bad people were trying to take away their newfound financial freedom, it was very easy to convince these young, relatively ignorant, working class people to “defend” the country they proudly built with their own hands.

      If the GOP did a 180° on all of their economic policy, of the last 60+ years, to follow a similar story arc, I would be extremely concerned. With how down-trodden our 3 youngest generations are, the conditions for an American copy of nazi Germany couldn’t be more perfect than they are right now.

      I’m not a historian. I just read a book on this subject recently. Feel free to correct or add to anything I got wrong/missed!

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If they flipped on their last 60 years of policy though… I’d be much happier with the status quo though. A new new deal and a thriving economy that helps the working class would be great. It would give far fewer issues that we need to address at once. Shit, if you got them flipped, since Republicans tend to fall in line they’ll take it as a win and celebrate it as they believed he would be good the entire time ignoring all of his policies changing. And it lands the Republicans left of the Democrats. Meaning when the Democrats lean towards the pubs to get voters … they’ll be moving left as well. If we somehow got healthcare and fair wages and taxation better through this… Then we only have to focus on ensuring they don’t subjugate populations like minorities, and get policing under control which all would be easier with a thriving economy and workforce. Less people are scared when more people are doing well. Whether someone is racist or not, the stereotypes become harder to push on people. A few other huge things like climate change, but with high taxes on the rich pushes companies to invest their money into their companies to avoid paying those taxes which in turn will churn out good things. (Either more quality, efficiency, research and expansion). Maybe we could finally catch up on battery tech and secure our own energy sources and grid for the future. That would be a great way to put America to work. Building an upgraded grid with storage and modularity for natural disasters.

        Don’t get my hopes up on this shit just to

        • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          While I generally agree, I would still be extremely skeptical of those changes coming from the people that have spent the last 60 years sliding us into a situation were we desperately need those changes. If that was the play, I would see it as a decades long scam with the intent being to purchase legitimacy with a lie. The logical conclusion being they want absolute power and see a working strategy to obtain that by following in the nazi’s footsteps, with some modern revisions.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Skeptical is understandable. But we can use some wins man… if the winds blowing in the right direction better to veer the ship in the right direction than try to go agaisnt it while hurting and tiring ourselves out in the process.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The difference being that the Nazis were often competent people, and there was not the same massive base of crony capitalism with its fingers firmly enmeshed around every single area of government like there is in the US currently.

        I won’t say it’s impossible, and I think they might be able to leverage social media to construct the exact same mass movement of loyal followers with the exact same horrifying results, but I don’t think the type of economic populism that did it for the Reich is feasible for the MAGA people to pull off. Definitely not with Trump at the helm.

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            I mean, they took over the country and then more than half of Europe. Hitler fought in the infantry and wrote a whole book. I’m not saying they were geniuses and some parts were a pure clown show, especially after Hitler took over for real, but Trump literally just shuffles around shitting in his pants and doing whatever the last person who talked to him convinced him is a good idea.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      And just like that, Steve Bannon learned about all the structures of liberal democracy that have thus far been stopping crony capitalism from squishing him like a worm on the sidewalk.

      There’s a reason he isn’t hosting his little podcast in Russia or Algeria. He’s not 1% of strong enough to survive without the cushy protection afforded to white men in America who are broadly aligned with the rich people.

    • astrsk@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thank you, this is the real lesson to take away from this, not some bass-ackwards universe shift again.

      Edit: Stray thought about this again, this is why right wing populism is both effective at getting elected and devastating on countries as it shifts to fascism. Appeal to the masses while conspiring to retain power and increase wealth accumulation at the top.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      None of this matters. Bannon is still useful to the media when they want a headline but he doesn’t have enough influence with Trump to actually action anything like this anyways. Trump’s cabinet is nothing but billionaires lol.

      • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        One would like to think so. The problem is that imagining a right-wing Republican willing to jackboot some motherfuckers is easy; imagining one who wants to out-FDR FDR? Come on.

        • olympicyes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          FDR wasn’t the champion of civil rights but he did fix the primary economic problems of the US during the depression. I personally don’t trust Bannon either but he’s clearly comparing to FDR not Hitler.

            • Microw@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Bannon is from a catholic Irish family, his parents absolutely admired JFK. The whole reason why Bannon founded Breitbart was to propagandize an alternative right (alt right) to the elitist GOP. This does add up for him personally. Would Trump’s party do any of this though? Of course not.

            • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Yeah, really. I mean, there was an entire plot to assassinate FDR called the Business Plot and they counted on literally a retired general to help them pull it off, who they were going to install as a dictator. A year later the general testified against his fellow conspirators before a House committee. Nobody was actually prosecuted (huge mistake, IMO), but the final report said, “there is no question that these attempts were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient.”

  • Geobloke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been hate listening to his podcast. A lot of what he says would be considered pretty eft leaning. But then a lot of it is conspiracy minded. Honestly Lauren to his podcast, it’s pretty unbearable, but he hates the elites as much as anyone here. It probably goes some way to understanding why trump won

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      But he and Trump are elites. Especially Trump. You really can’t get much more elite than someone who owns a skyscraper in Manhattan with his name on it.

      • DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Elite is a conceptual category. He’s a human being like the rest of us and a small ornament on the tree of life.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I would say “has his name on the skyscraper he owns in one of the richest cities in the world and is president of the United States” would fit most people’s concept of “elite.” I’m not sure who wouldn’t consider that person to be elite. You don’t think the word is being used in a complementary sense, do you?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Who exactly do you think they’re competing against? They won the election. They control all three branches of government. They’re set to turn America into a one-party state.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Bannon is from an ultra-conservative Irish-heritage working class family. He has always - at least in public - been anti-elitist, although of course he was an investment banker for years

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    He’s just talking nonsense though. There is zero chance Trump will tax the billionaires overall. They paid him off, they own him.

    But possibly of he’s feeling particularly pesky, he might target people he doesn’t like and target only them and pretend he did something meritorious.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ll tell you wants going on. He is saying the quiet part out loud.

    He is admitting that conservatives have always known what would make the country better but refused to admit it, instead have always played “dumb” by claiming their free market and deregulation approach is what they honestly believe is best for the country.

    I might be reading too much into it but imo this shows that decades of democrats playing fair and true to the process is why we got here. Because selfish people realized that they can take advantage of the benefit of the doubt and just ruin the government while pretending they don’t know any better.

    Pretty evil, more than I actually expected from him tbh.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lmao it’s like when the old white men become senile and slide to the right except Bannon is morally inverted.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Maybe he doesn’t want to get targeted by the adjuster. I mean killing CEO and the rich is hot right now with the 99%.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not polling all that well, tbh. Only hot with 41% across the income spectrum among youths, lower in every other demographic.

        • icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          The one poll I’ve seen about him was from a “company” that was created a few days before the poll released