You’re going to get yelled at by lefties on any instance. That’s how federation works.

I was literally googling earlier today to see if there were any updates on the next installment. Maybe it was subconsciously influenced by current events?

Anyone else remember the panic when you logged in and saw the notice that the site was seized by the feds?

I mean, certainly not something I experienced but I’m sure if I had it would’ve been terrifying to think the feds could find your info

I somehow thought it would be more calculated and not quite so broad.

Wild. When you dig into those poll results it is sadly clear that Kamala only would’ve won by pivoting right.

It’s typical for tech companies to organize as nonprofits and then restructure because they are losing cash?

Not sure if I’m misunderstanding you or what part you think is typical

Yeah, I really care about this, I’m literally losing sleep /s

God forbid I back up some folks on social media and say I agree with them

lol so this is cherry-picked data. They link to a source that shows if Kamala had been more conservative in these areas, she would’ve had more support:

Immigration Fossil fuels Ukraine (withdrawing support)

It also said that 14% said her support of Israel made them more likely to vote for her. 9% said it made them less likely.

Maybe MOST importantly is that the issues the polled on, in order of importance to voters, shows Gaza ranks LAST in importance. Shame on Common Dreams, I expected better.

It’s so easy to lie with data, thanks for illustrating that

Edit: okay, this is hilarious. Even the source they linked is wrong: “New Poll Shows Gaza Was #1 Issue For Biden 2020 Voters Who Did Not Vote For Harris”

Then the actual data disproves this. Neither for Biden voters who switched or Biden voters who backed Harris, it was not the top. For those who switched, it was NEAR the top. For others, it was dead last.

Also, the poll is exclusive to swing states.

I have literally never seen k used in percentages before. Km is common, as is using it if you’re writing out LARGE numerical values (10k or above).

I’m not saying it’s difficult to understand. I’m saying it looks stupid.

Skimmed the article and I’m still confused. Why can’t people just link to the actual data?

To piggyback on this, left-leaning echo chambers tend to underestimate the impact of turning on Israel amongst older voters, who tend to be more religious.

It’s literally the stupidest possible way to write it

Except Yass is like the face of oligarchy and the one reason Trump wants to stop the ban

Can’t blame him on that last one tbh

Grandma? You aren’t the best at guessing ages

I bet we can fundraise to get you there so you can just poop on the floor in the middle of the hearing. You can be the hero

Anti-trans laws have only increased in recent years. Having a Republican president won’t impact state legislatures and their momentum on this

Willing to put money where your mouth is on that timeline?

Conservatives don’t need another reason to roll this back besides money

4% of reported crimes. That’s even worse