A team of scientists say it is “beyond reasonable doubt” the Covid pandemic started with infected animals sold at a market, rather than a laboratory leak.

They were analysing hundreds of samples collected from Wuhan, China, in January 2020.

The results identify a shortlist of animals – including racoon dogs, civets and bamboo rats – as potential sources of the pandemic.

Despite even highlighting one market stall as a hotspot of both animals and coronavirus, the study cannot provide definitive proof.

The samples were collected by Chinese officials in the early stages of Covid and are one of the most scientifically valuable sources of information on the origins of the pandemic.

Their analysis was published last year and the raw data made available to other scientists. Now a team in the US and France says they have performed even more advanced genetic analyses to peer deeper into Covid’s early days.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Wuhan market didn’t sell bats.

      Also, the only bats with a (96%) similar covid strain were in caves 1000 miles away.

      However, samples from those bats were stored at the wuhan institute of virology.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Very first sentence quoted above. You don’t even have to go to the article:

        A team of scientists say it is “beyond reasonable doubt” the Covid pandemic started with infected animals sold at a market, rather than a laboratory leak.

        No amount of evidence or scientific consensus can convince a conspiracy theorist…

        And yes, I know:

        Despite even highlighting one market stall as a hotspot of both animals and coronavirus, the study cannot provide definitive proof.

        Therefore lab leak, right?

        • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          58 minutes ago

          The samples were collected by Chinese officials in the early stages of Covid and are one of the most scientifically valuable sources of information on the origins of the pandemic.

          This Part makes me question things a bit. China is not really known for being honest about things happening in China.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            56 minutes ago

            Questioning things is fine. On the other hand, it’s pretty hard to fake the ability to trace DNA to a specific market stall.

            On top of that, the person I replied to is not questioning. They’ve already decided it’s definitely a lab leak. See all of their other comments.

  • lunarul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Wasn’t this known already? Weren’t there all kinds of discussions about shutting down wet markets because of this?

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      There’s a bunch of indications / conspiracy theories that it might have been a lab leak. Basically there’s not really a way to know unless the Chinese government starts being more forthcoming with information.

      The main reason the conspiracy theory started is because the city where it started had a world renowned virus research facility in it.

      Of course, the reason the facility is there in the first place is because Wuhan province is a place where a lot of viruses originate naturally (in bat colonies), so it makes sense you research the viruses close to their natural reservoir.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Wuhan province is a place where a lot of viruses originate naturally (in bat colonies)

        This is disingenuous. RaTG13 was sourced in Tongguan in Mojiang Hani Autonomous County 1800km from Wuhan.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Wasn’t this disproven already? Covid has been detected in human waste matter samples from Autumn 2019 in Italy.

      Overall, the results of this blind retesting of a selected set of samples indicate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in some SMILE samples collected in the prepandemic period. The oldest samples found positive for IgM by both laboratories were collected on 10 October 2019 (Lombardy), 11 November 2019 (Lombardy) and 5 February 2020 (Lazio), the latter with neutralizing antibodies. Two additional samples collected on 17 December 2019 (Campania) and 28 January 2020 (Lombardy) tested as IgG positive by VisMederi and positive for IgG S1 and IgG S1+NP by Erasmus. Additional IgM positive cases could have been detected also by Erasmus by lowering the cut-off of the commercial IgM assay. The older among these putative additional IgM positive samples was collected on 3 September 2019 in the Veneto region, one of the first and mostly severely affected COVID-19 regions.

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8778320/

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t really understand what this is actually saying?

        Surely, if this were saying “covid started in italy” or “covid was around in 2019” that would rate more song and dance than a single obscure research paper?

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          These findings do not at all suggest that the virus originated in Italy, but they endorse the idea that the virus was likely spreading in China before the first known cases and that could have been circulated by travelers given direct the connections between China and European and US countries, particularly the Northern West and East Italian regions, which are among the most industrialized and connected areas of Italy.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah but the US media was too busy implying that China manufactured the virus in a bio lab.

      Funnily enough China still suffered because it failed to lock down early enough because the government tried to ignore and detain doctors in an effort to control the narrative that everything would be fine.

      The US suffered because they nuked their Pandemic emergency pla only like a few years before covid because Trump thought Spanish Fever wouldn’t reincarnate to finish the job on its 100th anniversary lol.

      So it was easy to vaguely point at China instead of actually solving the problem.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I don’t know what US media you were consuming in 2020/21, but it was pretty much understood it came from something exotic in a wet market.

        Most of us didn’t know what a wet market existed or what it was until COVID. There was some conspiracy shit that the right ate up, and some editorial and opinions on the idea, but the whole bioengineered super virus escaping a lab wasn’t taken that seriously

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You don’t even need to eat them; just being in close proximity to them and interacting with them is enough.

      On the other hands, cows, chickens, and humans came together to create a smallpox vaccine, so there’s that at least.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yes, it’s just that eating animals has a distinct history of causing horrible pandemics in humans. See e.g. the 1918 H1N1 pandemic which killed tens of millions and was likely started by hogs or chickens farmed in rural Kansas, swine flu which killed hundreds of thousands and whose name speaks for itself, and COVID-19 which killed millions and is well-understood to have originated in a wet market.

        Besides all the other reasons that it’s terrible, animal agriculture is a hotbed for transmitting zoonotic diseases to humans and combining existing human diseases with animal ones.

  • JoShmoe@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I suppose its mere coincidence that patient zero was a scientist that was experimenting with covid and its potential to transmit to humans. Pure coincidence.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Note, this evidence doesn’t rule out the preliminary scenario of a scientist from the bioLab visiting the wet market and infecting/contaminating some of the animal’s there.

      our study does not rule out human-to-animal transmission, as the sampling was carried out after the human infection within the market. Thus, the possibility of potential introduction of the virus to the market through infected humans, or cold-chain products, cannot yet be ruled out.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yes, that’s exactly what happened. Except it didn’t and science isn’t based on your feelings on an unsubstantiated anecdote and even IF it were real, real scientists with real brains are gonna figure this out. Not you.