Stock market logic, sell one cybertruck for $1m and your whole inventory is now worth 10x

Stock market logic, sell one cybertruck for $1m and your whole inventory is now worth 10x

But it’s just removed all it’s chargers

At least with that, parents who believe the science that their kids’ teeth will be better off with targeted fluoride treatment can buy the drops and tablets

Explain to me the science of how swallowing fluoride protects teeth.

Fluoride toothpaste is the scientifically valid, topical application method.

Planes are very noisy. Maybe audio would be useful on the ground.

Is just a fun little fact that Air Force 1 isn’t a plane.

You mean that the “hot senators in your area” ads are just scams!?!

Air Force 1 is to a regular plane what a Formula One racer is to a regular car

Achshually. Air Force 1 is used to refer to any Air Force aircraft the president travels on. That’s why it’s taken off more times than it’s landed.

the biggest bribe in the history of bribery.

Didn’t somewhere get a large wooden horse once?

Cameras and WiFi sniffers would be very useful. Not so sure about audio.

Hast

Much better allegory than G vs G. Thanks.

Note that both of those rulings are for the original rights holders (and therefore against AI tech).

What’s interesting to me is that we now have a goliath vs goliath fight with AI tech in one corner and mpaa and riaa (+ a lot of case history) in the other.

Either was I can’t see David (us) coming out on top.

That case is about fair use for parody.

Case law suggests using AI for parody is legal.

Would you trust Trump to accuratly repeat what he heard?

That’s not the argument that is being made though.

In Meta’s court case it is one of the arguments.

So do you target AI training explicitly?

No. Same rules as everyone else.

How can that he even enforced?

Disclosure of training sources

Is my review sentiment evaluation machine illegal now?

If your sources are copyrighted, yes.

What if I RAG copyrighted content in am I in jail now?

Unlikely. None payment of restitution in a civil case could end in jail via contempt of court.

How could this possible be ever enforced?

The same way other copyright claims are enforced.

This issue is dominated by tech illiterate

Literacy in technology has no effect on the law.

fall for copyright propaganda.

We’re had many years of publishing strengthening their legal position. It’s case law, not propaganda.

it doesn’t include any identifiable pieces of the training data.

It does. For example, Harry Potter books can be easily identified.

court decisions on music sampling and so far those haven’t been consistent,

Grand Upright Music, Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records Inc. (1991) - Rapper Biz Markie sampled Gilbert O’Sullivan’s “Alone Again (Naturally)” without permission

Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films (2005) - any unauthorized sampling, no matter how minimal, is infringement.

VMG Salsoul v. Ciccone (2016) - to determine whether use was de minimis it must be considered whether an average audience would recognize appropriation from the original work as present in the accused work.

the training of an AI is not piracy because no copying takes place.

One of the first steps of training is to copy the data into the training data set.