• unalivejoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I oppose war in Iran because was is detestable.

    You oppose war in Iran because you want troops in California instead.

    We are not the same.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 hours ago

    When I hear someone like MTG say something like this my first thought isn’t “Oh, she’s finally figuring it out!” No. It’s “What fucked up way does she think people need to be brainwashed to align more with her brand of shittiness?”

  • lemonaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    I have no idea if she’s just that stupid and only sees one move in front of her, or if she always knew but it’s only now suitable for her to say the truth. (It’s also possible it’s both with these people.)

  • IEatDaGoat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    I don’t even know her motivation. She could just keep quiet and not shoot herself in the foot.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    There’s a youtuber I like that uses the term “weaponized autism” but this is more of a “ballistic brain damage” scenario.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    46 minutes ago

    Well for once she has a point

    Probably the rare times she said something that isn’t totally crazy

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Saw polling where even Trump voters only have 25% support for attack on Iran, and majority of all demographics oppose by over 50%. There is a huge disconnect between zionist supremacist media and politicians, and American people. Not just war, but marjority of Amercians have unfavourable view of Israel despite absolute political/media dominance to “educate them”.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Polls also show overwhelming support for social security and taxing the rich, the GOP don’t give af and the R voters won’t change how they vote over this.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Kinda. MTG is ragging on Fox News, sure, but she’s also both-sides’ing media outlets on the left with her full quote:

      We have propaganda news on our side just as the left does

      She’s fishing for people to agree with her which legitimizes her claim that left-leaning news networks are just as untrustworthy as Fox News, which is and untrustworthy news outlet, but she doesn’t say shit about Breitbart or OANN or any of the other right-wing superspreaders of misinformation.

      So, she is a broken clock that’s currently pointing at the correct time, but she did it in a way to sneak in an untruth or two in there hoping that people would pick up on that and amplify the message.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Putting the new York times and fox news in the same category is correct as far as I can tell. I don’t oppose her calling NYT republican either.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Look, fuck this racist asshole Marjory. But liberal news sources are also largely garbage. The NYT, for example (well respected by liberals) is constantly giving voice to reactionaries, lying by omission, supporting US imperialism and just generally upholding the status quo, even when it means normalizing/legitimizing fresh horrors from republicans.

      • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I have not looked at the American mainstream press for a few months, but honestly cannot remember any broadcasters or papers who are decently covering all news

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I prefer “stopped clock,” since broken clocks can often continue ticking, albeit at the wrong speed.

      • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        A broken clock, whether it ticks too fast or too slow, is still right at least once every 24 hours, I think.

        The only exception would be one that ticks correctly but is not set to the right time (does this count as broken?)

          • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 minutes ago

            Where in my comment did I ever suggest that I don’t understand this?

            I was just reflecting on the comment that I was responding to, which was specifying that a broken clock may be running fast or slow, instead of being stopped.

        • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If it ticks faster than time than it would be right more than once (24hr time) a day, the faster it ticks the more times it will incidentally be correct (perhaps there is an allegory here…)

          A clock that ticks slower than time would be right less than once a day, but it can never…

          I feel like I need a simulator to understand this relationship actually…

          • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I was thinking of analog 12hr clock with no distinction between AM and PM

            I wonder if your 24hr clock example would be more intuitive as frequencies and phases?

            • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I was also visualizing the round analogue clock face, but didn’t want to muddy the water by saying “twice” when I guess it’s technically only once, just no am/pm delineation.

              I am puzzling over this at work now. I guess a fast clock could be right almost infinite times a day if it ran fast enough, but a slow clock can only be as slow as a whisper faster than stopped, which would mean it could be right alllllllllllllmost twice a day, but never twice a day.

        • AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          She probably gets a couple softball questions right from time to time :

          🗣 " Today is Thursday, right?"

          🧟‍♀️ “Yessssssss!”