😜 OK MAGA I brought some 🍿 to watch the mental gymnastics justifying her release.

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    "…explained that releasing grand jury materials from Maxwell’s case “would create undue prejudice so severe that it would foreclose the possibility of a fair retrial”

    There it is. The excuse to redact/withhold whatever they want as ransom to keep her in prison

  • DoctorNope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Ah, see, you think you heard that MAGA was going to “release the Epstein files” but what they actually said was “we’re going to release the Epstein pedophiles.” Yeah, they’re letting everyone involved with him off the hook.

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I can see this as an actual tactic. It means that do-gooders have to handle each and every one of the released, or be forced to focus on just one.

      Considering the nature of MAGA, unleashing violent criminals upon the innocent remains in character. 😞

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Democrats can’t do anything. They don’t have the capacity to accomplish anything useful. They’re absolutely powerless.

        That’s why you should vote for them.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You don’t get it. The minority party somehow has the power to do whatever they want; they just don’t because they’re exactly as bad as Republicans.

          /S

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Rare?

          Democrats have a pattern of vocally opposing issues only after they irreparably solidify them.

          In 1986 they helped pass draconian drug laws and mandatory minimums that supercharged mass incarceration, then decades later turned around and branded the “war on drugs” a moral failure.

          In 1994 they wrote and championed the crime bill that funded more cages and longer sentences; only once whole communities were gutted did it become fashionable for them to “reckon” with mass incarceration.

          In 1996 they joined Republicans to “end welfare as we know it,” slapping work requirements and time limits on poor families, then years later started admitting it deepened extreme poverty.

          That same ’90s crew pushed NAFTA and the broader free-trade consensus that helped ship industrial jobs overseas, then reinvented themselves as champions of the working class once the damage was locked in.

          They joined in financial deregulation at the end of the decade, tearing down New Deal banking walls, and after the 2008 crash, suddenly discovered the virtues of regulation.

          On social issues it’s the same story: they crafted “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and passed DOMA, then only when public opinion flipped did they pretend they’d always been on the side of LGBT rights.

          They voted for the 2002 Iraq AUMF and let Bush have his war, then spent the next decade calling it a catastrophic mistake.

          They backed the 2006 Secure Fence Act to harden the southern border, then later denounced wall-style politics as cruel and nativist.

          So no, Epstein Island wasn’t some weird one-off “bipartisan moment.” Bipartisanship is the rule whenever it comes to locking people up, bombing someone, cutting social supports, or serving corporate interests, and Democrats in particular have a long record of helping build the machinery first and only discovering their consciences after it’s too late to dismantle it. At least the Republicans consistently tell you they hate you to your face.

            • 3abas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Nice twist.

              My problem is that they’re always on the wrong side of history, and only start using the vulnerable as rhetoric after they can’t kill and maim them profitably.

              They don’t serve us, they use as to serve the capitalist class.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Well she trafficked underage girls who were sexually abused by rich men as part of a Mossad honeypot. Not like she did anything wrong.

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Her father was a triple agent for the UK, Russia and Israel, I’m sure he’d be very proud, had he not ‘fell’ off his boat when he stopped being useful

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This is gross.

    There’s no way she should get released. What she did is beyond atrocious.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The letter further cautioned against releasing documents related to Maxwell’s case, as they may “contain untested and unproven allegations”.

    It explained that releasing grand jury materials from Maxwell’s case “would create undue prejudice so severe that it would foreclose the possibility of a fair retrial”, should her petition to be released succeed.

    Oh, I get it. Just another ploy to keep the Epstein files hidden?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      We’ve got emails between him and dozens of billionaires. Larry Summers chat logs where he’s asking for advice while cheating on his wife. My Brother in Christ we have his Quora search history.

      How many more files do you feel like you need to see? Nobody else is going to jail for this shit.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You can really tell who they want in jail and who they don’t when you compare it to Luigi Mangioni’s case. They were happy to release all sorts of documents and publicly state he is guilty (despite being presumed innocent in the eyes of the law)

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Exactly. Plus, this all feels SO coordinated. Trump team had a private conversation with her. Then she gets moved to a comfortable prison. Trump approves the release of the documents, but what do you know? She is now appealing for her release and thinks the documents shouldn’t be released.

        There’s 100% shit in there Trump doesn’t want public.

    • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Lmfao I didn’t know “my client needs to avoid all consequences so the truth doesn’t get out” was a valid legal defense.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      My client does not wish for this information to be released because this information is incriminating.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It will be interesting to watch all the sAvEtHeChIldReN qtards trying to spin this if Taco were to release this child molester.

    While they are doing that, I sure hope some people take it upon themselves to ask these idiots when “The Storm” is supposedly coming? And how does freeing Ghislaine the child molester figure into this supposed “Storm”, LOL?

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The current MAGA position seems to be that they weren’t children, they were just very very very young adults…

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m reminded of Jon Ronson’s observation in “So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed”, that the religious right are surprisingly tolerant of sexual misconduct scandals in a way that progressives aren’t.

  • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The most depressing part is that she’ll get her release. She’ll find a way to bribe Trump, and he’ll give her a presidential pardon because he’s a whore. Then she’ll go back to what she was doing before and business will continue like usual for them because everybody will move on from it just like they did with the Panama papers before it and the Snowden leaking the NSA’s mass surveillance even further back. Accountability and justice are dead in this timeline.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      She’ll find a way to bribe Trump

      You mean like… tell him she will spill the details about the redacted stuff in the released documents?

      • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You don’t even need to blackmail Trump, just offer a few million dollars and words of praise and that’s all you’ll need for a pardon.

    • capital_sniff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They aren’t dead they are just on an extended vacation. Things will improve once the boomers move on and we fix the brains of the younger ones.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    He will pardon her, and commute her sentence. He just pardoned a massive, evil drug lord.