

If you watched the interview y’all are mocking just to defend a Biden, he talks about his presidential ambitions.


If you watched the interview y’all are mocking just to defend a Biden, he talks about his presidential ambitions.


I don’t know about this `racists who fought a war over owning slaves “had a sense of shame” and “didn’t want to be remembered for their part in the most destructive and pointless war” take.
When they eventually did build statues, they imported them from the north. They didn’t build them in their lifetime because it wasn’t a popular thing to do, and as such they literally didn’t have the skills or foundries to make them. Not to mention they were actually fighting a war, not sitting in their bunkers ordering air strikes.


You only accept money in return for goods? You don’t labor?
Weird flex, or you’re just not thinking this through, even though I spelt out a few different scenarios.
Put yourself in the shoes of an average person. You go to a gas station and pay cash, your change is $1.23 and they give you a Trump coin and tell you that’s all in the register, what do you? You let the company keep your change? You take it and drive to a bank to exchange it?
You buy a water from a vending machine on a hot day, you put in a $5 bill and the machine gives you a couple Trump coins back, you throw them away? You give them back to the machine?
You may be able to avoid it, I don’t ever use USD cash, I’ll be able to avoid it, but the general public will be using it. If it proves unpopular like the 150 year anniversary coin that similarly carried a portrait of the sitting president, it’ll be removed from circulation and actually become a collectable that some moron will pay thousands for. If not, it’ll be used like any other coin.
It’s already in circulation, arguing with facts because you don’t like them is dumb, just as dumb as someone suggesting they’ll destroy their own money “on principal”. This is burning your own shoes or destroying your own beer level stupid, since you like referencing dumb conservatives.


What does that have to do with accepting money?


EVERY country has some sort of equivalent.
Oufff. Nope. Don’t say things so confidently.
There are tens of countries that don’t have any income tax, tens of other countries have a flat tax, and if the remaining counties that have more complex tax systems the vast majority don’t require annual filing.
Your system is not complicated for your benefits, it’s made to benefit the rich.


you may be able to personally avoid it, but it’s going into circulation and the general public will use it


They’re there, they just don’t get the same attention as stupid stunts like a new coin or renaming places.


And if that’s all they have, you’ll still refuse it? If a machine gives it to you, you’ll throw it away? You’ll go to a bank and wait in line to exchange it with a bill?
I get where you’re coming from, it’s disgusting, you may be able to personally avoid it, but it’s going into circulation and the general public will use it, and simply refusing it isn’t an option or a stupid costly one for a lot of people.


You’re rich enough to refuse money? Good for you.
It’ll be in circulation, in vending machines, in cashier’s registers, everywhere soon enough. And when all the morons that paid over $1 for it realize it’s not a collectible item, their life savings will enter circulation as well.


He restarted the war with Iran and bombed a wedding. Which backfired and Iran is tightening traffic in the Hormuz strait further. Israel is ramping up rhetoric to attack Qatar, a key ally of the US and host to the largest US military base in the region.


Pedophilia.


I don’t understand this weird defense of the IRS in this thread. The IRS has always been problematic, and you highlighted the dumbest part: everyone is required to file.
Why? So H&R Block and TurboTax can make billions off you.
The government knows what you make, your employer reports it, your bank transactions report it, and the only income that truly depends on self reporting is cash “under the table” pay, which doesn’t get reported anyway…
The IRS takes an 0 interest loan from every American, makes them jump through hoops to fill various complicated forms or pay a company to do it, just to get your money that you loaned them back.
It’s a stupid system designed to create complex scenarios for rich people to pay less taxes, why are you all defending it exactly?
You should want something more reasonable like a flat tax, and use that to fund social safety nets so it doesn’t effect low income earners as much. Instead everyone is throwing insults to defend the IRS?
It was already designed to make you pay more taxes than the rich, there’s nothing to defend about it. It would be significantly cheaper for the IRS to simply tell you exactly what you owe out of every paycheck, and get away with the whole “filing” process.


🙏🏽
Hopefully you’ll run out of money to bomb the rest of the world.


The US commits (directly or through Israel) daily 9-11s, and given that 9-11 was motivated by American terrorism in the first place, the whole “never forget” can only work for the one comfortable generation that never experienced any other event like that.
The current generation sees what’s happening, they see the US bombing schools and weddings, and they see Americans commit mass shootings at events and at schools. If another 9-11 happened today, you’d have a much harder time getting everyone on board with invading another country for revenge.
They’d still get away with it probably, sadly, because Americans don’t seem to ever be ready to revolt. But I can’t imagine it would be the same unity.


“Instead of focusing on genuine problems of international peace, prosperity, or good relations, this body is debating map projects from the 16th century, and their role in promoting reparations and ‘cognitive justice,’” she said.
The strategy here seems to be to say the good thing in a mocking tone and hope enough people laugh and point with you.
America doesn’t want a precedent of paying reparations for all the damage its empire has done to ~25 generations of humans around the world.


What’s your point? If they built it in their time, the Jim Crow south would have destroyed them a hundred years earlier?


As with most modern weapons, AI was “tested on the battlefield” when they used it to justify bombing Gaza. They set the precedent for using AI to target and destroy a whole city.


Your initial take is not completely wrong though, democrats are a right wing party from a leftist perspective.
Republicans are openly racist, they believe in hierarchy based on race. Democrats of today aren’t so racist, but both parties are classist. They believe in hierarchy of class, if you’re rich enough you deserve healthcare and housing and good education and clean drinking water, and and and. If you’re poor, they’ll use you as a talking point, but they’ll do whatever it takes to make it as difficult as possible to move up between classes.


“only republicans are the problem”
“vote blue no matter who”
Liberals are just as bad as conservatives. It’s a team sport to them, and if you dare point out a flaw about their team they get defensive and accuse you of being on the other team.