The sorry state of streaming residuals shows why SAG and the WGA are striking.

  • ribboo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So about $40k shared among all writers seem almost reasonable had they written all of them, and we keep the same ratio…?

    6k per person for a full season on a really popular hit show seems absurdly low

    • notatoad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But we’re not talking about salary here. We’re talking residuals, per quarter, paid on top of the salary they received for the original work.

      For a show that is 13 years old. Collecting $6k per quarter for work you did 13 years ago and that you have to do absolutely nothing for anymore seems pretty good to me?

      There’s a hell of a lot of working class people who would absolutely love to be getting paid like that. Trying to frame this as the working class vs the rich seems really dishonest. Do TV writers even understand what the working class is, or how much we make? I sure as hell don’t collect $6k per quarter for work I did 13 years ago. If I did, I’d be rich.

    • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not that I’m trying to still for the corpo here, but this is a per quarter payment. ~$270 per episode from this single quarter just based on viewers from 2 streaming services. We don’t know how much they’ve got paid in aggregate for this single episode.

      Presumably they got something upfront/hourly initially and they’ve been paid residuals for many years, as they did the work in 2011 and episodes have been rerun alot on network tv.

      Idk how much is reasonable for the work they did do but it’s certainly been alot more than this small payment.

      • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        they’re probably going to make 5k a year for 6 months a work for 30 years from 11 episodes of 1 show. they might be owed more, but there is a ton of missing context around this that passing judgment on what could be a simply outdated contract from before streaming was a major consideration. if this is just a fraction of what an equivalent contribution to a show would have made from TV reruns or home media sales, then there is a conversation to be had, but no one has brought that up.

    • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s 3k to a few of many writers for 11 total episodes. We don’t know the actual streaming numbers of those exact episodes either. Could they be paid better? Maybe, but no one has compared this to the traditional residuals they did get.