• алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Once again, the non-revisionist non-reformist internationalist socialist position is to not take sides in a conventional inter-imperialist (read inter-capitalist) war.
    Ukraine de facto acts as the proxy of the West, while Russia is a regional imperialist power.
    Both are capitalist governments fighting each other over their respective interests, there is nothing proletarian about Ukraine; the international proletariat belongs to no country…

    Anti-colonial/liberation wars are another topic. Critical support is warranted there, even if it isn’t a proletarian movement fighting them.

    All the liberals masquerading as leftists always seem to forget “No war but class war!” whenever it’s convenient for them; so please eat your veggies read your theory…

    • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      “No war but class war” doesn’t mean you cannot fight or support a defensive war.

      If it does, it is an irredeemably stupid position.

      The non-revisionist, non-reformist, internationalist socialist position can eat dicks.

      If there is an imperialist aggressor invading another country, then the MORAL position is to side against the aggressor. Because regardless of how you feel about the governments (which, fuck all governments, so what’s the point in making that distinction?), the civilians will be feeling the brunt of the war.

      There is an imperialist aggressor and it is Russia.

  • BanMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 minutes ago

    Ukraine support doesn’t bother me, that’s not splitting anyone here. Palestinian support, when it’s fervent enough to make Dems vote against Dem candidates, now we have a problem. Domestic issues, when they involve a fascist takeover, are simply more pressing than 70-year-old foreign policy, even if it does need fixing… it has for a long time. We won’t be able to get there if we’re an authoritarian hellhole.

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Amazingly, you can also be against a country *violently and illegally invading another one!

  • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I would support Ukraine if Ukraine didn’t forcefully kidnap it’s own citizens to force them to die for their country either they want to or not.

    The way I see it, it’s just two oppressive elites enslaving the powerless.

  • baka@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Ukraine is pro-Israel just as much as the US govt… so fuck Ukraine, as for Russians… Stay in your country, you act like assholes to all of your neighbors. Love to the good people that exist in all of these nations.

    No war but a class war.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ukraine is the most pro-proletariat position.

    Anyone who doesn’t grasp that is either a tankie, fascist of an idiot

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      ‘I stand with the Russian people against Putin and the oligarchs, bring your kids home with a quick stop in Moscow. I know damn well some of you fuckers remember how to be communist’ might beat it out.

    • RmDebArc_5@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I’d agree that the current political system of Ukraine is better for the workers there, however the is a conflict caused by the existence of capitalist nations. The soldiers dying wouldn’t fight if they weren’t forced to by their nations. Ukraine should be supported, but only in the sense of supporting a capitalist to get rid of the aristocracy

      • Panini@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        This was has a lot more to do with imperial domination than capitalism, and framing it as being caused by “capitalist nations” rather than “one specific imperialist warmonger, the invader” is questionable at best.

        This is largely, though as you acknowledge not entirely, not a war fought over workers’ rights so much as the right of a sovereign people to choose their future.

        • RmDebArc_5@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Bad phrasing on my part. Russia obviously started this war, however it can only come to this because Ukraine and Russia exist as separate antagonistic nations and not because the people living in these regions hate each other so much that they have to go to war with each other. Russia shouldn’t impose a future on the Ukrainian people and they should be supported in defending their ability to do so, however the Ukrainian government shouldn’t be equated with the future Ukrainians want, it’s still a (partially) corrupt, capitalist government.

        • RmDebArc_5@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          I don’t want this to devolve into a long discussion about democracy in Ukraine, but even though Ukrainian soldiers might be defending their homes, Ukraine as a nation is defending it’s political system. If Ukraine surrendered immediately some people would still have been killed, some houses destroyed and some private property taken over by Russian oligarchs, but Putin wouldn’t have taken every single home of Ukrainian citizens. The Russian soldiers attacking the Ukrainian homes aren’t doing this because they want the houses but because they are forced, or at least brainwashed to do so because the Russian state wants control of Ukraine.

          The main support should be of the Ukrainian and Russian people suffering from war, secondary that of Ukraine as a state as it’s current political system is better for it’s people than Russia’s.

          Edit: Ukrainian soldiers aren’t actually actually able to attack the people that want Ukraine to be invaded (Putin), the treaties they signed with the western nations to get support forbids them from attacking targets on Russian territory, meaning they have to defend them against their invaders meatshields not against the invaders

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I’m afraid there are a lot of historical examples of how things can go very wrong inside the country if the govt doesn’t like some specific group. So even ceding the whole country and becoming a part of the empire Russia might not have helped much

            • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I’m confused, here you’re saying brainwashed soldiers but down below you’re saying that war crimes can only be committed by people that are inherently evil. How can it be both?

              • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 minutes ago

                No, that wasn’t what I said, you just don’t read very well.

                And I didn’t say they were brainwashed, the person above me did, and I repeated their argument to show how stupid it was.

                You’re not good at this, please don’t try again.

            • RmDebArc_5@feddit.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Never claimed they don’t. The Russian propaganda commonly demonizes and dehumanizes Ukrainian(-soldier)s. They also like to pretend that they are actually doing this for the Ukrainian people (like the US). Do you think that Russian soldiers commit war crimes because they are inherently evil?

              • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Do you think that Russian soldiers commit war crimes because they are inherently evil?

                yes, anyone who commits a war crime is an inherently evil person. a normal person, even during war, does not torture or rape someone. don’t try the nazi defense, that’s bullshit and you know it. if you have the choice of raping and murdering civilians, or being shot for refusing orders, and you choose to rape and murder, you don’t get a pass for just following orders. you’re still a rapist and murderer. you’re still evil.

                • RmDebArc_5@feddit.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 hours ago

                  Let’s agree to disagree. We clearly have very different ideas on human nature and I don’t think either of us is an adequately educated physiological professional to hold a sensicle disscusion on the topic

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  That’s a dangerously naive mindset. Anyone can be tricked into committing war crimes. It isn’t just certain groups that are inherently susceptible. Normal people are very capable of atrocities. Fascism and of course capitalism specialize in incentivizing said atrocities.

        • RmDebArc_5@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I think people wouldn’t fight over countries if there weren’t any states

            • RmDebArc_5@feddit.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              16 hours ago

              But why are they and their friends being attacked? Are those attacking them doing it because they just don’t like them or because they are being told to by a state?

                • RmDebArc_5@feddit.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  10 million reasons for one person to kill another maybe, but 10 million reasons for hundreds of thousands of people to fight each other with billions of dollars of weapons that aren’t created by states? I don’t think so, but if you know one please tell me. If you’re asking if I think there wouldn’t be any violence at all in communist or similar society, then no I don’t, but I think none at this scale