Too many of the potential jurors said that even if the defendant, Elisa Meadows, was guilty, they were unwilling to issue the $500 fine a city attorney was seeking, said Ren Rideauxx, Meadows’ attorney.

  • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This makes sense to me, but I also think that you shouldn’t be able to dismiss the jury en masse more than once. Jury pills are what, 20-30 people? If they can’t find 12 people and/or set 1 doesn’t work out for some reason and the judge agrees, you get one more shot and either accept the hand you’re dealt or drop the case.

    When something of similar scope happens to the defense they can ask for a change of venue, and if it’s granted that’s it. The trial proceeds.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is picked up on elsewhere in the thread that basically this, itself, is a form of jury nullification. If the law is so bad that they can’t ever get a jury together to try a case, then that law is unenforceable and effectively nullified.