

History isn’t a living thing, it’s a concept. People within history may be biased, however.


History isn’t a living thing, it’s a concept. People within history may be biased, however.


There’s an entire field of study called “History” and people are trained to do just that. YOU, specifically, want otherwise. Don’t project that on other people.


Bonus points if they open Spotlight and type “CMD”.


All things that suck and are part of human nature. Sadly most people seem unable to grow past their primal urges.


Where did you gather that I’m ok with that? What a strange comment. One can view history through a neutral lens.


Honestly, though, this has happened throughout all of human civilization. It’s only now that people think it’s generally a bad thing. In the past, you either didn’t care, suffered it, or celebrated the conquest.


What does the UK export that they could leverage here?


Thanks for that input. I might look into something.


Do people genuinely rely on these or are they really just a novelty?


I think that the idea was that there is a special point where you feel secure and nothing beyond that makes any difference. But that $75k number sounds familiar. It’s probably more like $120k today.


$100,000 with a child is nothing. Two or three children? You’re struggling.


Why is it necessary to go on the attack over a past attempt that didn’t work? That’s how innovation functions. Sometimes you hit the mark and sometimes you don’t, but everyone learns from the process.

I’ve also long suspected that PETA was once an upstanding organization that had internal strife and the original founders pushed out by the psychos.


This is the most accurate take I have yet seen.


There’s a big difference between doing something in a lab and mass producing it for millions of people.

My first thought: why do these efforts have to be exclusive? We can do both.


People who vote for law and order or over things like “crime” that are displaced from the real statistics are fucking morons and will always vote their emotions.


quote from Eugene Debs
I had to look that one up. Good reference.
You mean to say that some people who write history are biased. History itself does not hold agency.