A 14-year-old boy has been arrested after allegedly killing his parents and severely injuring his 11-year-old sister at their home in a rural community in Fresno County, California, on Wednesday, authorities say.

The suspect, who is not being identified because of his age, originally called the sheriff’s office after the double slaying and told them someone had broken into their house in Miramonte, attacked his family, and fled in a truck, Fresno County Sheriff John Zanoni said during a news conference Friday.

Detectives later noticed inconsistencies in the boy’s story, according to Zanoni.

“Evidence ultimately showed that he had fabricated the story of a break in and was responsible for using multiple weapons to attack his mom, his dad and his sister,” Zanoni said.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, we should. But let’s compromise and put safeguards in place instead. Like background checks, registration to monitor over eager purchasers, and generally restrict the ability of someone to take the life of a other.

    • Zaderade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      In Canada we have gone to extreme lengths on gun control, specific to handguns. You can take a restricted firearms course, allowing you to own handguns, and other restricted arms.

      The rules go something like this. If you own a handgun, the government can come and check on you at almost any time. You must keep it locked in a safe. You must keep ammunition in a separate room. If you plan to take the handgun to the range, or anywhere outside of your home, you have to contact the government for approval and establish a timeline.

      I may not be 100% accurate on those laws but that is the gist of it. The idea is to cut down on firearm related crimes.

      Now answer me this. How is that cutting down on crime at all, other than punishing lawful gun owners. How many people that caused death or injury with a handgun, took a PAL course to legally buy it? My gut says little to none. Those who commit the crimes buy handguns illegally.

      It may be a sort of bias, but fuck me have there been way more shootings in my locale lately. Drug and gang related but still.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Those handgun permits aren’t just a matter of applying and taking a course and then you can have a handgun. As I understand it, they grant them to specific professions, like law enforcement and trapping.

        Which means people aren’t able to legally carry pistols around, which means it’s risky to do so, which means that not many do so without a specific intent, which means there’s less random gun crime because someone happened to have a hidden gun in the heat of a moment where they were briefly pissed off.

        And those random inspections and storage rules aren’t meant to prevent legal owners from doing any violence. If one decides to do so, there’s not much those rules will do to stop them. But they will make it less likely that some other random person who hasn’t been vetted can get ahold of that gun. Usually there’s some kind of violent intent or intent to service a violent intent when guns are stolen, so making it painful to leave your guns in a position to be easily stolen can make a real difference.

        • Zaderade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          This makes sense. You are able to apply for a license to carry a pistol, however chief firearms officers are denying them, regardless whether you meet criteria or not. The RCMP also will not disclose how many permits for carrying a handgun they issued on a given year. Fun facts.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah, I’m sure it does nothing.

        Not related, but how many school shootings did you guys have up there in 2023? Is firearms the number 1 cause of death for Canadian children? Because it is in the US.

        Who needs actual statistics when you have anecdotal experience, right? Just trust your gut.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Firearms are not the number one cause of death for children…this bullshit was stirred up by having children mean 1-19 for firearm deaths and 1-15 for car deaths. It’s still cars…the pandemic caused a slight outlier and everyone jumped on it. People didn’t drive in 2020 much at all, of course deaths dropped…and suicides went up because surprise…no one was getting out.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I know it’s a difficult statistic to accept. It’s hard to believe.

            But yeah no. I haven’t seen anything to indicate that these statistics are inaccurate in any way.

        • Zaderade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          How many school shootings did we have in 2016 comparatively? How many of you actually live in Canada and watched the news about these stories unraveling after 2019?

          I’m not saying that GUN CONTROL BAD GUNS GOOD as much as you guys are portraying it that way. I asked how is it cutting down on crime and one of about 15 comments actually had a logical response to that without being a dick about it.

        • Zaderade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          I completely agree the US needs to change some things but what I’m asking is are the 1.5-2 year old laws made in Canada actually cutting down on gun violence in Canada? Because what I see first hand is no change.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The laws you’re taking about are much older and the ones you’re thinking about haven’t been made law yet.

            I linked an article that shows the actual numbers but I can’t do much about how you feel.

            • Zaderade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I mean this in the most polite and conversational way possible but what you are saying is wrong.

              October 21 2022 a national freeze on sale and transfer of handguns was placed. It is still in effect today unless you take a restricted firearms course.

              The article you linked me does in fact show that the US has a gun violence problem, which I believe should be rectified. How? I don’t know.

              Your article makes no mention of handgun/restricted weapon (automatic rifles) crime statistics decreasing after 2022, which is what I am getting at.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                11 months ago

                If you own a handgun, the government can come and check on you at almost any time. You must keep it locked in a safe. You must keep ammunition in a separate room. If you plan to take the handgun to the range, or anywhere outside of your home, you have to contact the government for approval and establish a timeline.

                All these laws were in place in 2019.

                2022 changed some rules on buying or transferring ownership of restricted weapons.

                • Zaderade@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I stand corrected by several years, but again, I don’t think recent amendments 2019+ has reduced crime. Our government has taken lawful gun owners, and are trying to take their weapons away. No criminal who owned a handgun is going to go and turn in their weapon that they may use in a crime.

                  Edit: take a look at this link https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2022001/article/00009-eng.htm

                  It is firearm crime statistics from 2009 to 2021. I would like to see up to 2023 but it isn’t there unfortunately. I see no correlation to 2019 law amendments and decreasing crime. Except for maybe robberies. Which I would have expected to increase with COVID and unemployment. That being said perhaps there hasn’t been enough time passed to reflect the law changes via statistics.

                  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    We’re talking about something entirely different then we started off taking about.

                    I’ll let you have this conversation by yourself.