In a shocking, horrifying incident at Shawnee Mission East High School, a Black student was hospitalized after being attacked by a white male student. Despite being the victim, she faces suspension in a case highlighting systemic racism and administrative negligence.

  • Globulart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My wife is half Jamaican and half Iranian, she went to a school in a very working class part of a very ethnically diverse city in the UK, with most of the school having a familial origin in the middle east or India.

    She was routinely bullied for being black and called the N word on a daily basis. She was made to feel like a troublemaker for reporting it to teachers and eventually snapped, her kickboxing lessons helped her break a boy’s nose with a kick to the face after years of abuse, and she got suspended for it while nobody ever faced any consequences for their racism.

    People don’t want to punish wrongdoing, they want to keep things “simple” and not have to deal with anything they feel awkward about, so they ignore the repeated “small” incidents and only acted to punish the retaliation because it’s deemed disproportionate. Years of racism to the point of having no friends because people were scared of being seen to sympathise apparently isn’t as damaging as an afternoon in A+E and some minor discomfort for a week or so. Fuck that school and fuck this mentality.

    This story seems like a worse version and we’re 20 years on. I’m sure it happens way more than we see in stories like these, they’re just swept under the rug and hope nobody calls them on it. Fuck this backwards ass world.

    • ScrotusMaximus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a great observation that explains so many ills with our society when the victim is punished. People collectively don’t care about justice. They only care about minimizing discomfort. Retaliation is only viewed as the original “source” of trouble making more trouble. I saw this same story play out for a coworker who was bullied by her male coworkers. The “guys” didn’t appreciate her around and made her life miserable, so of course she acted out. Thier boss tried to sympathize with her but ultimately didn’t protect her because she was one and they were many. Their boss started to view her as a pain in the ass because she would constantly report small injustices that on their own wouldn’t be considered harassment.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lots of people showing up real fast to make excuses for white supremacists doing white supremacism… now why does that sound so familiar?

    Oh, right… I’m South African!

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You ain’t wrong. Went through the comments here and goddamn some of y’all need Jesus.

      Also, Sawubona! Unjani?

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Same thing happens here in South Africa every time white supremacists are caught on camera doing their thing… white liberals will fall over themselves to make up justifications and excuses for their behavior. It’s about as predictable as clockwork.

        Sorry, I never learned isiZulu - I know a bit of Sesotho, but it’s about as good as my German (ie, crap).

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    y’all ever notice how “zero tolerance” only kicks in once the black girl tries to defend herself? It wasn’t zero tolerance when they were shouting racial slurs at her. That was simply tolerated. It wasn’t zero tolerance when the white boy beat the shit out of her. When she refused to just quietly take the abuse, however, then “we have zero tolerance for hate or violence of any kind and therefore we have no choice but to suspend both students”.

    Rights for whites, no slack for blacks.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should be protest held outside that school and the homes of the administration until they resign our removed and the student should be unsupended.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    i remember this story from 30 years ago. here it is; no administrator wants to/is allowed to make a decision. so everyone gets the same punishment, and no actual judgments are made as everyone is at fault.

    schools administrators can now be replaced with a matrix of policy, they need no longer be human. this is what happens when parents sue school districts into the ground.

    • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      But by doing this are they not opening themselves to even worse lawsuits? A student was called a racial slur and hospitalized and they’re handing her the same punishment as the aggressor.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        According to the article, racism is a systemic problem in this school. One of the school officials, yelled at some black kids because they were walking down the hall together and thus “were looking intimidating.”

        When the administration is racist, they’re willing to overlook students being racist.

      • Copernican@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I always hate the blurred lines of administrative disciplinary action or criminal investigation. What is the schools role if a criminal investigation is underway.

        Also, I think the article is missing some key facts, like durations of suspensions. I think some could argue that both the boy and girl deserve some suspension, but it by no means should be equal suspension given the racial charged aggression. Is there a difference between a closed fist punch versus a shove? Who through the first punch?

        Did the article even mention the date this occurred? It just says last week, which was a holiday week. So come Tuesday not sure how long the suspensions have even been served and what the administration is deciding for next steps.

        • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          She defended herself after he attacked her you goob.

          There is no defensible argument for suspending her. She very clearly defended herself.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “If someone starts to assault you just say ‘no thank you.’
            It’s against the rules for them to continue.”

          • Syrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually you can see she’s the one who went for the face first. He was just provoking and pushing.

            Bullies rarely start physically attacking people, they just provoke until the victim snaps so they have the green light and can say they’re not the ones who started it. That’s why it’s so hard to frame stuff like this, victims are in a situation of emotional stress and more prone to be impulsive, while bullies know what they’re doing and how to be able to “play the victim” afterwards.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would the obvious outcome need to be in the title? The problem being highlighted is punishing the victim.

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it’s a misrepresentation of the situation, a better title would be: “School Hate Crime: Racist Kid Yells “N Word” While Attacking Black Girl, Breaks Her Nose And Hospitalizes Her, but both get suspended”

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      They forgot that in the title.

      Doesn’t belong in the title. No victim blaming.

      Also that dude fights like a bitch.

      How does “a bitch” fight? Doesn’t seem like you have much respect for women either.

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Including the bull’s suspension as well in the title wouldn’t be victim blaming, it’s not even like victim blaming adjacent.

        • aelwero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “student punches another student and gets suspended”

          I don’t see any victim blame whatsoever here… Why is your comment in the negative? There’s something unspoken behind conversations like this and I have absolutely no clue what exactly that is…

          I understand the downvotes for comments along the lines of “there’s two sides to any argument”… I understand the victim blaming aspect of that, but “the bully got suspended”? I’m missing something…

          Anyone?