California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Makes it so less magazines are put on the black market. Just like a total gun ban would dry up the black market. In US and Mexico.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Nobody gives a fuck what criminals and terrorists could hypothetically use, they care about what they are using, which in nearly 80% of mass shootings is a legal firearm.

          • Vytle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            “Mass shooting” refers to any shooting where 3 or more people are injured, and it usually happens in areas with high unemployment. Kinda sounds like a class issue to me.

      • sudo22@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        How’d that work out for the drug bans? Cause man I could buy so much weed in college (in an illegal state), and trust me I literally never asked.

      • UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean… if you really cared, its a few hour drive to a state where you can legally buy them. Its not a large burden, and could be done in an afternoon.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Damn, sounds like gun laws don’t work then. Better change them to increase background checks and waiting periods.

          • Vytle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah and what are you wanting to regulate 3d printers and 80% lowers while your at it? gonna regulate sheet metal to prevent people from making guns?

            • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I don’t need to, because nobody is using them for mass shootings. But sure, I will absolutely advocate laws regarding the illegal manufacturing of firearms are enforced. I’ll also laugh when people blow their hands off.

              Fortunately since 3D printed guns don’t line the pockets of Republicans, lobbyists, sleazy PR companies and the people who simp for them, there should be no issue at all actually addressing the problem.

              If that problem ever actually exists of course. Isn’t it just fascinating that despite the entire world having access to 3D printers, they still don’t have gun violence that’s even remotely comparable to America? All of these comments saying

              It’s almost like “but 3D printers!” is just as bullshit as everything else that comes out of pro-gun groups mouths. 25 years of insisting it was doors or video games or rap music.

              • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I don’t need to, because nobody is using them for mass shootings.

                Ah, I see - you don’t care about the dead children, but rather that firearms are used to kill children. That’s really fucked up.

                Fortunately since 3D printed guns don’t line the pockets of Republicans, lobbyists, sleazy PR companies and the people who simp for them, there should be no issue at all actually addressing the problem.

                I’m not sure if you’re aware or not but blue team has been decrying the evils and supposed impact of these things for multiple election cycles due to their inability to actually address that perceived problem.

                If that problem ever actually exists of course. Isn’t it just fascinating that despite the entire world having access to 3D printers, they still don’t have gun violence that’s even remotely comparable to America? All of these comments saying

                I’d be interested in seeing you compare such countries by violence overall and then again compare them by available social support and safety nets.

                It once more seems you only care that suffering involved a firearm rather than actually caring about people and their suffering.

                • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Ah, I see - you don’t care about the dead children, but rather that firearms are used to kill children. That’s really fucked up.

                  Thoughts and prayers for whatever point you thought you had.

                  I’m not sure if you’re aware or not but blue team has been decrying the evils and supposed impact of these things for multiple election cycles due to their inability to actually address that perceived problem.

                  And “team red” takes $16 million a year from the gun lobby and are adamant the solutions just coincidentally align with what’s most profitable.

                  I’d be interested in seeing you compare such countries by violence overall and then again compare them by available social support and safety nets.

                  Of course you would be, because you’re looking for excuses to do nothing, especially excuses that might take decades to prove wrong.

                  But whatever “social support and safety nets” you find are still going to be paired with vastly better gun laws that try and balance social risk rather than protect profits.

                  You want a half solution that doesn’t impact you, not an actual solution.

                  • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    And “team red” takes $16 million a year from the gun lobby and are adamant the solutions just coincidentally align with what’s most profitable.

                    Ah, I see we’re forgetting about Bloomberg and his profiteering off of sensationalism of violence.

                    Of course you would be, because you’re looking for excuses to do nothing, especially excuses that might take decades to prove wrong.

                    Feel free to highlight any comment I’ve made where I suggest doing nothing.

                    Take all the time you need.

                    You want a half solution that doesn’t impact you, not an actual solution.

                    In point of fact, I quite explicitly argue for actual solutions.

          • Vytle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Work cited: crack pipe. You cant legally buy a glock switch, and there are plenty of exanples of glocks with switches on them (which usually come from china), and seeing as the ATF considers the switch themselves to be a machine gun, these are guns that were never legal, and yet theres an ungodly number of them on the streets

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      not only this, but lets be honest here, it does absolutely nothing to reduce the lethality of firearms. Even if an active shooter abides it; most people who’ve spent a modicum of time practicing can drop and replace a magazine inside of a second or two.

      Also, as Upgrayedd noted… you can drive a couple hours to arizona to get them. Or, just make your own mags. it’s not hard.

      I’m all for effective gun control laws… but this ain’t it.