• Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It wasn’t a dodge it got my point across. “Do women, in full possession of their faculties and well informed about their options, have bodily autonomy?”

    Then it shouldn’t matter how far along the pregnancy is, because any rule where you say “you can’t remove this from your body in the safest way possible” is infringing on that.

    You will have to excuse me, i do not understand your meaning behind “forced organ donation” in this context, could you explain that?

    If someone needs a kidney and you are match for them, would you support the government forcing you to donate one of yours?

    • Dashi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “you can’t remove this from your body in the safest way possible” is infringing on that.

      Ahh so in my opinion, that is the crux of our different stances. I have the belief that everyone has their rights until it infringes upon my rights or the rights of others. To me, in my opinion, at some point that fetus becomes a child/person and has rights of its own, now i don’t know when that is i would say 3rd trimester maybe? again in my opinion. So unless there is danger to the mother or child eventually at some point the mother should bring the child to term. I think if you hit that 7th month you should know if you want to keep the baby and bring it to term. Whether you give the child up for adoption or raise it yourself is another matter entirely.

      If someone needs a kidney and you are match for them, would you support the government forcing you to donate one of yours?

      No, now what does that have to do with this?