• Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    266
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    22 years? Yeah that is disheartening.

    There are several states in the South and Midwest that possession of marijuana can land you life in prison. That’s potentially a 70 year sentence for a young adult.

    Yet these jackasses can attempt to overthrow the US Government and install an unelected dictator and the longest sentence we’ve seen yet is only 22 fucking years?

    Yeah it is disheartening to see the hundreds that got off with house arrest, probation, or even at best landed behind bars for only a year or so.

    • MTLion3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t believe the sentencing for weed is still so strong. Like who gives a fuck, just legalize the shit already. I think that most of us can agree that alcohol has just as much of not more potential for harm than weed does and that’s legal.

      • holiday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Groups of people who like weed being illegal; Police unions, private prison owners, beer/wine/spirit producers, pharmaceutical companies, cartels, private rehab clinics

  • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Smashes a Capitol policeman with the riot shield you stole off of him. We are the good guys!

    Can you imagine the timeline if she were VP?

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t make it a blanket statement like that. Maybe something like “good guys don’t go to prison for attempting to overthrow the elected government to replace them with a fascist government”. If a fascist government is elected, I’d consider the people trying to overthrow it the good guys.

  • GreenMario@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Conservative women need to keep their mouth shut and stay in the kitchen. There are bible quotes on this. Every time they speak in public the only response should be

    KJV: “But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.”

    RSV: “I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.”

    GNB: “I do not allow them to teach or to have authority over men; they must keep quiet.”

    I wanna see hundreds of replies to every tradwife politicians with these every time they speak and I wanna see reporters repeat these instead of asking questions. If they want rights and be treated with respect, ditch the religion and trad shit and join the rest of us in the future.

    • Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      How about we start calling them out on all the foolish things the Bible forbids, but they ignore and do anyway such as:

      • Wearing clothing made of blended fabrics - leviticus 19:19

      • Wearing ripped or torn clothing - leviticus 10:6

      • Eating shellfish - leviticus 11:10

      • Eating pork - leviticus 11:4

      • No short hair cuts, and no shaving beards - leviticus 19:27

      • No tattoos or piercings - leviticus 19:28

      • No alcohol in church - leviticus 10:9

      • No working on the sabbath - leviticus 23:3

      • No divorce - mark 10:9

      • No wearing jewelry - timothy 2:9

      • No lying - leviticus 19:11

      • Don’t mistreat foreigners - leviticus 19:33-34

      • Buying or selling land - leviticus 25:23

      I could honestly do this all day as there are so very many things to write here, but I feel this is sufficient to demonstrate my point.

      Don’t let these people use their faith as justification to be terrible humans until they follow every word “written” by their infallible god in their hypocritical self contradictory book that none of them have actually read.

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That would take progressives to actually go on the offensive for once in their lives. It ain’t happening. We both know that.

        Conservatives lead an endless charge to alway be on the attack. Always lash out at the media, lash out against Democrats, lash out at the big bad gob’ment.

        Democrats aren’t willing to defend themselves if their own lives depended on it. And these days, that isn’t fiction anymore.

      • Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re taking Leviticus out of context! (Unless it’s about homosexuality, then it’s completely in context)

      • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Evangelicals aren’t bound by the laws of the old testament, so most of your list has no bearing on them.

        • Butt Pirate@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yeah they love that argument. Then when you say “the New testament doesn’t mention homosexuality so it must be ok” they go right back to Leviticus.

        • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          They aren’t bound by the New Testament either, with all that ridiculous socialism from that Jewish hippie

        • 5too@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re not, but a lot of their positions are justified by other things that sit right next to what Hazdaz listed.

      • clgoh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, some of those restrictions were lifted in the new testament.

        “It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out of the mouth; this defiles a person.” -Matthew 15:11

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Scary, but true: There are conservative women who have gone on record saying they’d be OK with exactly this. And if you attempt to make this argument in front of a conservative, the only thing they’re going to hear is this: “The bible says that women must be silent. Therefore we also need to repeal women’s right to vote.”

      Remember, this all started when some (probably nonexistent) trans kids in North Carolina wanted to use a different bathroom. Similar arguments were made and rather than the GOP come to their senses, they just kept doubling down and used it as a launch point for their culture wars. They basically answered every question like that with “We’ll ban that too!”

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are Republicans calling people that directly attacked and killed people in the hallowed halls of the Capital building “the good guys”?

    • Soulg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because they’re tribal partisan hacks. The only thing they care about is them VS everyone else

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re almost there. It’s because they’re liars (the politicians / boosters). Tribalism is reserved for their base. The leaders are cynical af.

        You think Tucker is genuinely perplexed by the issues he talks about with interviewees? Don’t worry, that’s a rhetorical question. I know Lemmy users aren’t idiots. Just making a point.

        • PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately, some Lemmy users are idiots. Had a discussion with a person who thinks unions are the worst thing to happen to workers, and would not understand that they’re the reason we have weekends. The person probably wants slaves.

        • CuriousLibrarian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The people who want to bring back slavery assume they won’t be the slaves. If they aren’t billionaires then they are making a big assumption.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      These are the same dingbats that have made Ashli Babbitt a martyr (and have doxxed the man who shot her) and never can answer the question. Just what the f— was she even doing there that day?

      Not one of the people that cry about her and pretend to be so very concerned about it can answer why she was even there. Of course, this is the same bunch that think killing someone over selling loose cigarettes (if they are Black) is NBD.

  • theodewere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sarah Palin has always been a fucking airhead, and fuck John McCain for legitimizing her airhead voice

    • teruma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      The sad thing is McCain could have easily beat a black guy if he didn’t pick a woman as his running mate.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think they meant Obama was representing a kind of progress that McCain thought he needed to compete with but his base would have been happier if he had just said “fuck that shit” instead of trying to be a conservative version of woke.

          It’s quite possible that McCain picking Sarah Palin as his running mate lost him more votes than it gained him for trying to be progressive.

          • NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can imagine it losing him both the republican voters who dislike women and all the voters who simply dislike her.

            I further believe that women voters while they do like representation they vote based on politics to a further degree.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sarah Palin knows what’s going on, because she reads ALL THE PAPERS! /s

    Non Violent!? They were calling for the hanging/execution of several politicians, with instructions and directions to go get them! 6 people DIED!!! Those that were truly non violent, got much more lenient penalties than the 17-22 years the leaders got.

    Sarah Palin is batshit insane calling these people good guys.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And look how they treated him at the end! As so many other things Republican, their behavior towards McCain lead by Trump was despicable.

        But McCain had a shred of humanity and honor, and there is no place for that in the new GOP.

      • 2piradians@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        When McCain chose her I remember thinking, “They’ve thrown out the last of the few principles they had. The nutjobs will be the new GOP norm”.

        IIRC, McCain didn’t even want her on the ticket, but he did go along with it–embracing the crazy to try and get more votes. There were many missteps that led to today’s chaos, but I always felt this was a big turning point.

    • IonAddis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It says something it didn’t even register on me that Palin isn’t Boebert at first

  • Hairyblue@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, The “Good Guys” were not the capital police fighting to protect Congress and the constitutional procedure taking place? The capital police who stood up to the deadly mob worked up by Trump and aimed at senators doing the work of the constitution…they were not the “Good Guys”?

    Palin is wrong and not a “good guy”.

  • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    At this point, fuck it.

    You’re right Sarah! You are the good guys, and there is just no point. Might as well stop trying to over throw the government and terrorizing marginalized communities. Even voting. It’s a lost cause. The deep state will come after you for interfering with their plans, so just stay home. Protest the system by being quiet and not participating.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    They can all get fucked along with you, Sarah.

    Imagine thinking Sarah Palin was someone whose thoughts were worth more than the wretched air they’re made of.

    • EvilBit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ehhhhhhh technically not true in a pretty important way. BUT, “patriots” sure as shit don’t try to overturn the valid results of a democratic election functioning exactly as it should. The word for that is “traitor”.

  • TheJims@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s all gather around and listen to the dumb ass who is consistently wrong about everything.