The Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal by a group of gun rights advocates seeking to overturn Maryland’s ban on assault-style rifles and high-capacity magazines under the Second Amendment.

The decision, a major win for gun safety advocates, leaves in place a ruling by the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals which ruled that the state may constitutionally prohibit sale and possession of the weapons.

The state legislation, enacted in 2013 after the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting, specifically targets the AR-15 – the most popular rifle in America with 20-30 million in circulation. They are legal in 41 of the 50 states.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    That seems like an awfully fringe and roundabout improvement for a law that ruins the fun for everyone else.

    Ruining the fun? That seems to be an incredibly weak argument for gun proliferation. I can see an argument for strong 2nd Amendment proponents as the Constitution grants rights and freedoms, and restrictions on those granted in the Constitution could be a pathway to a bad place. However, I can also see an argument that the evolution of firearms has outpaced our society’s safe use of modern firearms and that the freedom of victims of gun violence are also having their even stronger Constitutional rights restricted and spirit of our nation with the Declaration’s “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”. In this conversation I’m not advocating a position either way, but I can see the valid arguments on both sides.

    In neither one of those is “ruining” the fun" even a fraction of a thought to consider. You do you though.

    Have a good night.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Ruining the fun? That seems to be an incredibly weak argument for gun proliferation.

      Why, you have an issue with fun? You have an issue with a society where everyone can pursue their hobbies to the fullest extent, and find enjoyment in them? Do you not think it’s possible to provide responsible restrictions on firearms in a way that doesn’t prevent one from going out into the woods on a weekend with friends to merely enjoy nerding out on the intersection of machining and marksmanship? More importantly, do you not find it justified to argue for rights from the goal of having a good time? Fun isn’t covered in the constitution per se but I think this falls under the old “If I can’t dance, I don’t want to be a part of your revolution”.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Then do paintball.

        Guns, particularly handguns and AR-15s are specifically designed to kill humans. Do you really need someone to walk you through why that’s different than sewing or riding bikes?

        If you’re not even capable of understanding why your need to have instruments of death in order to have “fun” isn’t more important than other peoples’ lives and safety, then you have no place in modern society and should remove yourself and go live in the woods or something.

        • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Guns… are specifically dedigned to kill people

          Damn, dude! Better not learn about HEMA or fencing. Shit may give you an aneurism.

        • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Have you ever driven a car?

          Shame on you if you have. Some of those have been designed and used to kill people.

          How dare you. Go live in the woods!

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            If you honestly don’t know the difference between a car and a gun and what their purposes are, then I don’t know what to tell you.

            Honestly I believe you’re smart enough to understand, so either you’re being disingenuous, or you’re just refusing to allow yourself to go there because you’ve centered your entire personality around instruments of death.

            Cars are designed to kill people? Consumer vehicles? Lol right… Do better.