kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoJava at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhousewww.zdnet.comexternal-linkmessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1373arrow-down115
arrow-up1358arrow-down1external-linkJava at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhousewww.zdnet.comkirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square126fedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 days agoOOP makes so much sense. What happened?
minus-squareAnti-Antidote@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·4 days agoThe AbstractionBubbleFactory popped
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up9·4 days agoAbstractionBubbleBuilderFactoryStrategyImplementation mind you
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·4 days agoMany people increasingly find that using functional patterns enables them to build more reliable software.
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoI don’t think OOP is as bad as many people make it out to be. It’s perfectly fine in moderation. The problem is that it can lead to over engineered applications when abused.
OOP makes so much sense. What happened?
The AbstractionBubbleFactory popped
AbstractionBubbleBuilderFactoryStrategyImplementation mind you
Many people increasingly find that using functional patterns enables them to build more reliable software.
I don’t think OOP is as bad as many people make it out to be. It’s perfectly fine in moderation.
The problem is that it can lead to over engineered applications when abused.