• wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    As a cis man who is only tangentially acquainted with transgender issues, and as a person who isn’t particularly eloquent, I cannot do this topic justice myself. You’ll have to trust me when I say that the image of “just any bloke can call himself a woman and go into the bathroom and assault women” is language that is deeply colored by propaganda, and has no basis in reality. When you indulge in language and ideas like that, you are doing harm. Similarly, the “men doing women’s sports” idea is harmful to both cis and trans women, and has, again 0 basis in reality.

    If you are truly interested, and not some right wing troll who’s “just asking questions” (we get a lot of those on .world, it’s like the instance attracts them), please, please give these YouTube videos a watch:

    https://youtu.be/EmT0i0xG6zg https://youtu.be/qfUsuQ8rfu4

    The shorter one is from a cis man, but it seems to me that he explains the idea very well, at least behind the sports thing. And I promise that the longer one is worth it. It will help you understand a deeply marginalized segment of the population much better, and you will be a better person for it. I think that’s worth 2 hours.

    • die444die@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It boils down to this for me: If some bad actor is going to pretend to be trans to access some naked lady area, why are we trying to punish actual trans people for that by taking away their access to bathrooms and healthcare?

      It’s just stupid.

    • nieminen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thank you for this. I will absolutely go through both videos.

      I appreciate the context you provided as well. In my mind it makes sense that someone willing to break the law to hurt people isn’t going to stop because the sign on the door says it’s not for them. That argument never felt particularly strong to me, and I’m glad that you’ve affirmed it basically doesn’t happen.

      I’m no troll, and am truly trying to understand further.

      Thanks again for your time, I hope to be able to watch those videos soon.

      • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think you’re a bad person, i think you’re falling into the trap of trying to give bigots the benefit of the doubt.

        Most bigoted opinions are manufactured by special interest groups, when you realize that you stop caring about what bigots think or empathizing with them.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Thank you for your openness and candor. I hope you find what you’re looking for.

    • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      JK Rowling argument put simply is that women need a safe space, that there are opportunistic men that will abuse workarounds that let them access this safe space, therefore there needs to be tighter regulations on who can enter the safe space.

      Does she address that argument in some part of the video?