Not my point at all, try again. I said the point of the case for SCOTUS was to decide whether majority groups had a higher standard of evidence to meet discrimination claims. Which Justice Kagan stated quite clearly:
The only question the Supreme Court had agreed to decide, Kagan said, “is whether a majority-group plaintiff has to show something more than a minority-group plaintiff, here, whether a straight person has to show more than a gay person.”
Not my point at all, try again. I said the point of the case for SCOTUS was to decide whether majority groups had a higher standard of evidence to meet discrimination claims. Which Justice Kagan stated quite clearly:
You don’t have a point, there’s no evidence here to suggest she was held to a higher standard than anyone else, cry about it
🤦🏻♂️ Alright, dude, bye.
Bye!