Explain in detail; don’t just say it like it’s obvious and a “no shit” kind of take.

Your entire argument is based on the assumption that your morals are the “correct morals” while everyone else who doesn’t align with you is incorrect. That’s a textbook definition of this fallacy.

You are disingenuously undermining what veganism is by phrasing it as a trivial dietary choice.

That’s exactly what it is. Disagree? Explain in detail; don’t just say it like it’s obvious and a “no shit” kind of take.

There is no reason why veganism, as a subject, should get an automatic quick dismissal via accusations of a “superiority complex” than any other subject.

Where has that happened here? I challenge you to quote the comment stating as much. Seems like you’re strawmanning here.

I said “veganism isn’t about me.”

you are just repeating the same exact issue of ad hominem and a thought-terminating cliché by calling vegans “self-righteous” and disingenuously strawmanning them as people who just want to circlejerk about the “superiority of their choices”

“Veganism isn’t about me, but if you criticize me personally, you’re criticizing veganism!”

This is hilariously illogical. It reads like someone whose brain is short circuiting from all the cognitive dissonance.

No because their dog is also morally inferior for eating meat and should also be punished.

Hmm. Claims to not support animal torture yet joins hexbear and tortures all of us mammals on Lemmy any time one of you “writes” a comment. I’m seeing a disconnect in your reasoning here…

I’m sure it is and outlets are just taking the bait because they know it’ll generate clicks.

they have the exact same capacity as me to understand why veganism is a moral obligation.

This is a “begging the question” logical fallacy

this is an ad hominem and, as I stated, a thought-terminating cliché.

veganism is a moral obligation

carnism comes with victims

is it just cope?

What thoughtful discussion arises from someone repeatedly telling you that they’re morally superior to you for choosing one specific diet over another? You’re projecting here.

I have no issues with someone being vegan, but I take issue with self-righteous people such as yourself who can’t help but talk about how superior their choices are.

And here’s that exact superiority complex on display for all to see.

I still see people parroting these narratives about stuff like weed even after it has been legalized. Some people are too far down the propaganda rabbit hole.

Yeah these are the words of sycophants who are no better than MAGA Republicans. They have want to keep our system broken and ineffective because it keeps their idols in power.

Yes

Was this article written by AI? It reads very oddly to the point that it sounds completely made up.

They unite under their dislike of the other side and/or their supposed policies.

Netanyahu is already doing whatever he wants. You claim to think it’s grotesque yet call people “dumb” and “fucking stupid” for taking a principled stance against the people actively enabling it.

It sounds like you’re giddy about the ethnic cleansing. Gross.

The Republican party won’t go anywhere as long as we have a two party system.

People are downvoting you but it’s correct. The left has no representation in this country. It’s just far-right and right when you go to the polls.

How many milligrams are they? We’ve been legal for nearly 10 years now and I’ve never really noticed any difference from the stated dosage.

I have a few problems with this and first and foremost is that their study is about teens yet they surveyed ten to twentyfour year olds about it.

Secondly is that the infographic says that teens would prefer more friendships over romantic relationships but this doesn’t account for the fact that there’s been a trope for the last decade where there is always some stupid romantic relationship shoehorned into any fucking story even if it makes no sense or distracts from the main story. For all we know, teens and twenty-somethings could be tired of romance being injected into movies and TV when the story doesn’t call for it but be otherwise fine with it when it enhances a story.

Also wouldn’t the argument apply to subscribing as well? Consumers may not understand the consequences of subscribing to said service. Therefore, “click to subscribe” should also be banned.

Saving America one D at a time.

They didn’t name the node size after the guy they named it after the unit since it’s approaching sub-nanometer node size.