Honestly, I’m on the side of the oppressed worker, even the robot worker.

I mean, yeah. Their supporters see sexual and gender differences as degeneracy that will bring down civilization. Of course they support using tax money that way.

Ex-Twitter.

People are going to draw so many dicks on that boi.

Don’t insult Scabby like that. Cartoon rats are way better looking than this douche canoe.

If people can live free from the idea that biology is destiny, where will the right get its reproductive and domestic labor? That’s why abortion and transgender people get talked about the same way; both challenge the gendered distribution of money and power, both declare that common humanity matters more than differences in sexual/reproductive plumbing.

Yeah, but principles aren’t at stake here. Just surface decorum.

He can do it in a bikini, for all I care. Let’s not pretend Congress stands on decorum bow.

This will pair eell with their botcott of reality.

And he wrote that in the Germany of the 1800s…

You could do it as performance art and expose them. Money and truth, fuck yeah.

That movie is eugenicist. If you disagree, look up the definition of eugenics and watch the first 5 minutes of the movie again before responding, please.

Their parts get made. They get manufactured. Pretty sure that involves fairly substantial emissions, just not compared to what we have now.

Most people making those complaints at this point are bad-faith conservatives.

Congress repuires publicly-traded companies to do the bidding of shareholders, so it’s at least partly their fault.

If the alternative would be cutting production by 95%? Yes.

Funding is finite. Every bit of new EV-improvement research represents funding that could have been used elsewhere, like windmill-improvement research.

I understand the world you want to live in, but EV production causes too many emissions for it to be a global solution. If we don’t make the kind of changes now that would normally take 100 years because we recognize the seriousness of the threat, no amount of EV production will save us.

If the state can take those human rights from a criminal, they can make laws that define any one of us as criminal and take them from us.

That’s not eugenics. To qualify as eugenics, you’d have to be getting genetic counseling because you wanted to improve the human race, not because you think it’d be unethical to make your kid go through the same suffering you did with a genetic disease. Making eugenics more palatable by ignoring the ideology that defines it can harm people, so please stop.