• gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Love how you ignored their actual point to focus on the one thing they said that didn’t apply to the topic

      That’s what we normally do, which is a problem

      But for nuclear we have centuries worth of stockpile, so we dont have to do that

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        We don’t know we have centuries worth of stockpile. That’s just an assumption.

        In fact, I think it’s a foolish assumption to make since if the world’s nuclear powers haven’t been quietly prospecting the globe for new sources of Uranium since 1945, they sure should have been. But you don’t hear about a lot of new uranium mines opening.

        And what if this big stockpile us close to a major waterway? Or under a bunch of people’s homes?

        Acting like “we can just look and find more” as if it’s that simple doesn’t make sense to me.