Prices have risen by 54% in the United States, 32% in China and nearly 15% in the European Union between 2015 and 2024. Though policies have been implemented to increase supply and regulate rentals, their impact has been limited and the problem is getting worse

Prices have risen by 54% in the United States, 32% in China and nearly 15% in the European Union between 2015 and 2024. Though policies have been implemented to increase supply and regulate rentals, their impact has been limited and the problem is getting worse

Housing access has become a critical issue worldwide, with cities that were once accessible reaching unsustainable price points. Solutions that have been proposed, like building more houses, capping rents, investing in subsidized housing and limiting the purchase of properties by foreigners have not stemmed the issue’s spread. Between 2015 and 2024, prices rose by 54% in the United States, 32% in China and by nearly 15% in the European Union (including by 26% in Spain), according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

…

Salaries have not grown apace with real estate prices. In the EU, the median rent rose by 20% between 2010 and 2022, with rental and purchase prices growing by up to 48%, according to Eurostat. Underregulated markets are wreaking havoc, and in the United States and Spain, 20% of renters spend more than 40% of their income on housing, while in France, Italy, Portugal and Greece, that percentage varies between 10% and 15%, according to the OECD. Many countries have created programs aimed at increasing the future supply of public housing, but their effectiveness has yet to be determined and analysts say that results will be limited if smarter regional planning decisions are not made.

  • AA5B@lemmy.worldEnglish
    38·
    1 month ago

    Tax vacant homes.

    I know this is a popular idea on Lemmy, but intentionally vacant homes are a very small minority next to homes that are not livable or not sellable. It’s mostly going to hurt people who can least afford it

      • AA5B@lemmy.worldEnglish
        12·
        30 days ago

        Driving through rural areas and seeing all the unlivable homes. Seeing home listings in the rural area I grew up how long they can be on the market even when houses sell here their first day

        I don’t see actual stats, but the internet has l plenty of anecdotes like

        Edit: data is mostly by state, but does show rural states have th highest percentage of vacant homes. Looks like about 7.5 million “permanently vacant” homes in the US, or 5% of the market, and some percentage of those just won’t sell

        However,Alasaka is a great example, listed as one of the highest percentage of vacant homes - but not one of the highest rates of homelessness

          • AA5B@lemmy.worldEnglish
            11·
            30 days ago

            Your reply may have come between my original wording and an edit that I thought was “quick enough”

            • undergroundoverground@lemmy.worldEnglish
              2·
              30 days ago

              The edit doesn’t really show why it would effect poor people disproportionately. Also, no one should be surprised that vacant homes in the ass end of alaska have very little effect on rates of homelessness.

        • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
          3·
          30 days ago

          Homes where noone wants to live don’t count towards relief for a shortage unless you can figure out how to make those places at least baseline attractive to people. Jobs, schools, parks, a sportsball team, all that stuff.

          • AA5B@lemmy.worldEnglish
            23·
            30 days ago

            Exactly. Passing a tax on empty homes will disproportionately hurt people who can’t sell for homes that can’t solve the problem

            • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
              4·
              30 days ago

              Still makes sense in places with tight housing markets, though. Triply and quadruply so if it’s infested by speculative investment. Then make sure that short-term rentals require a hotel license if it even smells of being a commercial short-term rental (couch surfing is completely fine, doesn’t take up a housing unit) and last, but not least: Public housing. Look at Vienna as to how to do it but that can literally take the better part of a century to do because land. Specifically in the US, you also need to build tons of public transit don’t worry even if you make your metro free at the point of use it’s cheaper than road/sewer upkeep in suburbia. Suburbia is a financial graveyard for municipalities, they just don’t generate enough tax revenue for the infrastructure they demand.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.eeEnglish
          2·
          29 days ago

          Seems like a solvable problem. If the home isn’t livable, have it condemned. Now it’s a tax write off.

        • Noobnarski@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          30 days ago

          Only put a tax on vacant homes where there is an active housing crisis, rural areas should be excluded

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
          1·
          30 days ago

          I don’t see anything here that supports the idea that a vacancy tax would “hurt people who can least afford it”. Even if we go the anecdotal route, the location of vacant homes says very little about their owners.