• surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not to split hairs, but how many underage girls did Jesus marry?

    I get that you can’t paint an entire religion with a single brush. People are different. People are people. But when the prophet they revere had some very questionable takes on this topic, you have to realize that religion is fine with it.

    • elouboub@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only peaceful religion is Jainism, but they are all outdated attempts at explaining the world and thus wrong.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to split hairs, but how many underage girls did Jesus marry?

      He is a fictional character and within the fiction none. However, for a traveling Rabbi he did spend a surprising amount of time with women alone. Which is interesting if you were wondering why there might have been a motivation to make him up.

      If you really want to do this why not mention Solomon? How many of his concubines (sex slaves) were under 18?

    • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Muslims don’t really follow him, or a book, or scholars.

      For good and ill, they are the same as other religions.

      They follow their conscience and tack on religion after to justify.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      How many Linux users are pedophiles? How many guitar players? How many pickleball enthusiasts?

      Its a silly metric to judge a huge population on.

      Can you name a single activity that hasn’t had one person commit an unrelated crime? Can anyone?

      I’m not here to bat for religion, but I am here to bat against thinly-veiled racism, no matter how “enlightened” it is purported to be, or how intentional on behalf of the author.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Linus Torvalds came out as a pedophile tomorrow, he would be actively shunned from the community. Just saying.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          RMS did not do anything as bad as child fucking and look what happened to him.

          No, I am not justifying what he did I am only saying it isn’t as bad as raping a kid.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          not my point. I’m saying the argument I was originally responding to is saying that is Torvalds came out as a pedophile then all Linux users or users of products with Linux on would be pedophiles by association.

          that, I assert, is ridiculous and if I was to guess at it’s motivation I would say it’s certainly Islamophobia, likely xenophobia and probably racism.

      • Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not what they’re saying. It’s not a problem that their prophet was a pedophile, the problem is that they worship the prophet that was pedophile as a core element of their system of belief

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I dont particularly care about being downvoted, but I am interested in this discussion. I understand why it’s happening, I’m asking nuanced questions about a topic people think is open-and-shut. I’m half expecting to be called a pedophile myself at some point. I’m not. I hope we can continue to discuss without thought-terminating cliches. I know even writing this sounds pretentious, but I just don’t want to get side tracked into emotive yelling. So, with that aside.

          If a single concept is part of a structure, why does that make all users of a structure compliant with the requirements of that single concept? Or is it only Islam? If only Islam, what makes that ideology different from other religions? Or is it only religion? And if only religion, what makes religion different from other ideological structures such as language, sports, genres of music, literature, video games… or education, preferred software choice, venues … ?

          Is that not exactly the same as saying D&D == Devil Worship, Call of Duty == Being A School Shooter? By the same token, isn’t “having a bank account / money” showing support for “preventing children from having chemotherapy” or “evicting babies to be homeless” as both are parts of capitalism, because, as argued here: if one part of the structure is objectionable, and people use that structure they are necessarily in support of all forms and uses of that structure.

          Does the pedophilia thing apply to Picasso? If someone from a religion taints that entire religion, what are the boundaries for Picasso’s pedophilia “ruining” art? Is it art only after Picasso thats bad? Is it only paintings? It can’t be “just liking Picasso’s work makes you a pedophile” (which I think is a silly argument, but that is what is being argued here) because otherwise the Mohammed thing wouldn’t populate to other areas of religion, but in this argument it does.

          Same question with Woody Allen and movies etc