You could write about the specific actions in your comment, so the points you’re making are comprehensible. Vagueposting with link spam isn’t an effective way of communicating your ideas.
I’m a busy girl. I don’t have the time to read three entire articles to decipher a single sentence.
It begs some obvious questions. What form of collaboration? What specific group is meant by “Nazis”? Why not just write a second sentence? It’d be quicker for everyone. Its pretty clear the person I’m writing to is knowledgeable about this, and I would rather hear it directly.
The first link had an anti LLM filter that took 8 seconds to clear. The last link was paywalled. Seems like a bit of an ask, to expect that level of time and monetary investment of anyone reading. Just elaborate a bit, it’s all I’m asking.
First link is the Democrat’s own press release their plans.
Second link is a screen capture of DNC’s official twitter account reendorsing Hakeem Jeffries, who ushered Trump, an AIPAC recipient.
Third link can be secondarily source. e.g.
The second link is not the dnc’s official Twitter account.
You linked to a completely different article for the third link.
I no longer trust that you’re arguing in good faith. If you have a point or a quote to point to, please do that. I’m not wasting any more of my time reading articles that don’t say what you say they do.
At this point it is you acting in malus fides, that you won’t see Bernie, Mamdani, or Hakeem’s own statements irt their plans these next two Nazi years.
How about you show me the opposite, and Demolish a deathcamp.
It’s even funnier that it’s triggering the people who are so goddamn miserable they can’t even take a day to enjoy a combined effort against Nazis.
If you haven’t been notified, DNC triple confirmed they’ll collaborate with Nazis.
They’ve have already hoovered me as a “Russian agent” thrice. I corrected their insult.
This message is for others as well. So don’t take my “you” as personal.
What in those links are you pointing to? As far as I can tell they don’t seem terribly relevant to your point, but maybe I’m missing something
Democrats are collaborating with MAGA?
You could write about the specific actions in your comment, so the points you’re making are comprehensible. Vagueposting with link spam isn’t an effective way of communicating your ideas.
I’m a busy girl. I don’t have the time to read three entire articles to decipher a single sentence.
What more specificity do you need‽ The links are evidence of the statement.
I’m a busy person too.
It begs some obvious questions. What form of collaboration? What specific group is meant by “Nazis”? Why not just write a second sentence? It’d be quicker for everyone. Its pretty clear the person I’m writing to is knowledgeable about this, and I would rather hear it directly.
The first link had an anti LLM filter that took 8 seconds to clear. The last link was paywalled. Seems like a bit of an ask, to expect that level of time and monetary investment of anyone reading. Just elaborate a bit, it’s all I’m asking.
Every link goes into the specifics. MAGA are Nazis. I thought you were a busy person.
Do you want me to copy and paste the articles or something?
Your first link is about how voters want them to defeat maga.
The second link is an organization I don’t know endorsing(?) a person I don’t recognize with 0 context clues of what that means.
The third link is paywalled.
What collaboration are you pointing to? Because I don’t see what you’re talking about.
First link is the Democrat’s own press release their plans.
Second link is a screen capture of DNC’s official twitter account reendorsing Hakeem Jeffries, who ushered Trump, an AIPAC recipient.
Third link can be secondarily source. e.g.
Mamdani & Bernie reaffirming their collaboration.
You didnt address my problem with the first link.
The second link is not the dnc’s official Twitter account.
You linked to a completely different article for the third link.
I no longer trust that you’re arguing in good faith. If you have a point or a quote to point to, please do that. I’m not wasting any more of my time reading articles that don’t say what you say they do.
At this point it is you acting in malus fides, that you won’t see Bernie, Mamdani, or Hakeem’s own statements irt their plans these next two Nazi years.
How about you show me the opposite, and Demolish a deathcamp.
You want to share a quote that stuck out to you from literally anything you linked to?
I said not to take it personal. Why did you feel to downrank my reply?