You must log in or # to comment.
Peak liberalism.
12 death sentences handed down at Nuremberg btw.
From wikipedia…
“Piotr Cywiński, director of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum, estimates that of the 70,000 members of the SS involved in crimes in concentration camps, only about 1,650 to 1,700 were tried after the war.”
Calling it all paltry would be an understatement.
Yes but many many more across Europe. We always focus on Nuremberg because it’s where the American focus was, but there were plenty of other trials. Some formal, some informal, some mob.
One of these is not like the others
Nah, he is commanding the French/British side of the attack, therefore it’s fitting.
I mean what do you think America was doing in WWII?
Hint: Aside from beating up fascists, it’s war crimes.
I’m France and feel it personal.
I only see right wing politicians here doing the usual americanism of invading other parts of the world.
I’m sorry, just to be clear, is this comment pro Nazi?
No. It is a comment on how fascism is a product of capitalism in decay. Since all of these are outspokenly pro capitalism, they want to uphold the underlying contradictions that give rise to fascism in the present and future.
Even the reformists here will only support positive change (mostly domestic) insofar as it lets the system of oppression against the (global) proletariat continue.
I actually think the depiction mimicks the historical event somewhat adequate (at least the Western front) but not in the sense that you do: The US was not the beacon of light that defeated the nazis, that was the Soviet Union. The US and Nazi German fighting was capitalist infighting, similar to that of your democratic leaders and republicans.
Calling everyone involved right wing was a conscious provocation justified by the above.
Fuck off, tankie. Imperialism in poland and Finland isn’t a good thing.
Did you comprehend what I wrote? What imperialism are you talking about?
ok, this one’s funnier
It’s even funnier that it’s triggering the people who are so goddamn miserable they can’t even take a day to enjoy a combined effort against Nazis.
I said not to take it personal. Why did you feel to downrank my reply?
If you haven’t been notified, DNC triple confirmed they’ll collaborate with Nazis.
They’ve have already hoovered me as a “Russian agent” thrice. I corrected their insult.
This message is for others as well. So don’t take my “you” as personal.
What in those links are you pointing to? As far as I can tell they don’t seem terribly relevant to your point, but maybe I’m missing something
Democrats are collaborating with MAGA?
You could write about the specific actions in your comment, so the points you’re making are comprehensible. Vagueposting with link spam isn’t an effective way of communicating your ideas.
I’m a busy girl. I don’t have the time to read three entire articles to decipher a single sentence.
DNC triple confirmed they’ll collaborate with Nazis.
What more specificity do you need‽ The links are evidence of the statement.
I’m a busy person too.
It begs some obvious questions. What form of collaboration? What specific group is meant by “Nazis”? Why not just write a second sentence? It’d be quicker for everyone. Its pretty clear the person I’m writing to is knowledgeable about this, and I would rather hear it directly.
The first link had an anti LLM filter that took 8 seconds to clear. The last link was paywalled. Seems like a bit of an ask, to expect that level of time and monetary investment of anyone reading. Just elaborate a bit, it’s all I’m asking.
Your first link is about how voters want them to defeat maga.
The second link is an organization I don’t know endorsing(?) a person I don’t recognize with 0 context clues of what that means.
The third link is paywalled.
What collaboration are you pointing to? Because I don’t see what you’re talking about.
