Biden Looks to Prevent Future President From Ending Ukraine War - News From Antiwar.com
archive.li
The Biden administration is working to reach a deal with Ukraine for long-term military support to keep backing the war with Russia that would be difficult for a future president to exit, The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday. The effort is part of a commitment made by G7 nations at the recent NATO summit … Continue reading "Biden Looks to Prevent Future President From Ending Ukraine War"

edit : replaced article https://archive.li/QmPGT

https://news.antiwar.com/2023/08/29/biden-looks-to-prevent-future-president-from-ending-ukraine-war/

cross-posted from: https://lemmus.org/post/516550

The effort is part of a commitment made by G7 nations at the recent NATO summit in Vilnius to negotiate their own bilateral security deals with Ukraine. Besides the G7 nations, 18 other countries have agreed to provide long-term military support for Kyiv.

A US official told the Journal that one proposal being considered for Ukraine would be a memorandum of understanding (MOU), which would not require congressional approval. President Biden has previously floated the idea of an “Israel model” for Ukraine. The US provides Israel with $3.8 billion in military aid each year under a 10-year MOU but does not provide mutual defense guarantees. The Journal report said that French officials have suggested military aid commitments for Ukraine should be over a four-year period.

  • circularfish@beehaw.orgM
    44·
    2 years ago

    OP, we have received reports about the source of this post. Reviewing it, there is a good bit of libertarian and what could be considered pro-Russian propaganda elsewhere on the site, to the point it could be fairly considered an opinion blog pushing an agenda. The headline also deviates from the original source reporting. Other mods may ultimately take this down, but in the meantime please consider substituting the original article upon which this (opinion) piece was based:

    https://archive.li/QmPGT

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.mlEnglish
      7·
      2 years ago

      I’m frustrated by so many apparently technically inclined people not understanding that certain archive sites are not great to use.

      https://jarv.is/notes/cloudflare-dns-archive-is-blocked/

      We don’t block archive.is or any other domain via 1.1.1.1. […] Archive.is’s authoritative DNS servers return bad results to 1.1.1.1 when we query them. I’ve proposed we just fix it on our end but our team, quite rightly, said that too would violate the integrity of DNS and the privacy and security promises we made to our users when we launched the service. […] The archive.is owner has explained that he returns bad results to us because we don’t pass along the EDNS subnet information. This information leaks information about a requester’s IP and, in turn, sacrifices the privacy of users.

      This means that Archive.is and it’s various other domains (including archive.li) 1. Don’t respect privacy and 2. are effectively blocking anyone who uses CloudFlare’s DNS from viewing any of their pages (that’s me).

      Please use a different archive provider, for the sake of privacy and those who respect it. Because I can’t actually view your link due to my DNS.