Everytime I look at small problems or big global problems, if you follow the money trail, it all leads to some billionaire who is either working towards increasing their wealth or protecting their wealth from decreasing.

Everything from politics, climate change, workers rights, democratic government, technology, land rights, human rights can all be rendered down to people fighting another group of people who defend the rights of a billionaire to keep their wealth or to expand their control.

If humanity got rid of or outlawed the notion of any one individual owning far too much money than they could ever possibly spend in a lifetime, we could free up so much wealth and energy to do other things like save ourselves from climate change.

  • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    We’re looking at two extreme ends of the pole here. Zuck, Bezos, Musk are the shittiest public billionaires. There are also more secretive ones who are arguably even more destructive. These people have absolutely justified their own downfall, if it ever comes to pass. On the other side, Dolly doesn’t even technically count on this list because she has given enough away to not be a billionaire. Those are the easy cases where almost every reasonable person agrees on the “right” thing to do.

    Now, we have to remember that there are people who exist at every little increment along that scale of giving back to general shittiness for the global population. Focusing on the billionaires themselves and their lifestyles or whatever is not the answer. We need to focus on making effective tax brackets, effective regulations on the avenues billionaires generally target for power (political institutions, media companies, etc), and effective spending of the increased income from those new taxes to help raise the lower class to a more equitable position. That’s a socdem perspective though, because I do not foresee capitalism collapsing in my lifetime and I like to be pragmatic.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      doesn’t technically count

      well I’m saying billionaires so we absolutely don’t catch any splash damage.

      what are we even arguing about?

      • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not sure anybody is really arguing in this entire thread. Just discussion of edge cases and the gray areas on an interesting shower thought.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          valid. parton is an edge case, an extreme outlier, or she would be if she counted. which she doesn’t.

          so I feel like its a pretty good validation of the metric.