Telegraph investigation reveals those on front line are being exposed to gases banned during wartime

Russian troops are carrying out a systematic campaign of illegal chemical attacks against Ukrainian soldiers, according to a Telegraph investigation.

The Telegraph spoke to a number of Ukrainian soldiers deployed in positions across the front line who detailed how their positions have been coming under near daily attacks from small drones, mainly dropping tear gas but also other chemicals.

The use of such gas, which is known as CS and commonly used by riot police, is banned during wartime under the Chemical WeaponsConvention.

Ihor, the commander of a Ukrainian reconnaissance team who is deployed near the front line city of Chasiv Yar, in Donetsk Oblast, told The Telegraph: “Nearly every position in our area of the front was getting one or two gas grenades dropped on them a day.”

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    So this is how all laws work except it’s very different? Or how would I interpret this? What is how all laws work?

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’re not there to protect the weak from the strong. They exist to facilitate division, and keep the weak weak by cutting out dangerous(to power) elements while keeping the objections of the populace at large minimal.

      Tools for exploitation, wearing a protector’s mask.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I dunno if I believe that to be 100% true, regarding the “all laws” part. But definitely a substantial amount true, for sure, sadly.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m sure some were intended otherwise; I’ll give you that, but they’re all used the same way, the institutions around them are all pretty die hard about that, etc.