• NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    One side simply wants you to be well. The other side wants you to die. We are not the same.

  • 10_0@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just get an NHS, oh wait Americans don’t want taxes and would rather get fleeced when they stub their toe.

  • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Actually, the painter wrote a 6. They were commissioned to write a 6.

    Fuck your perspective, people should consider the original intent and research rather than just argue about it. Calling it “free speech” doesnt make it right or moral.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In this thread: People that oppose healthcare already proven all over the world screaming and crying about strawmen.

      • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And would with M4A. There would be no such thing as “out of network” and as such the only limiting factor would be if the doctor themself already has too many patients.

  • mvuvi@baraza.africa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What do you mean both sides are the same? They are not. One is 6 and the other is 9.

    Edit: I don’t mean it in a cynical way. Just that positioning matters in establishing truth. It is not just a matter of perspective (defined as subjective perception) but rather a matter of position (defined as inter-subjective agreement).

    • UnverifiedAPK@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s actually pretty on point, but OP’s conclusion is off. People are discounting the amount of Americans that are just good with doing a bit of frontier surgery on themselves and calling it a day.

      Yeah they have bad planning for the future during end-of-life care. But technically speaking it would cause them to pay more in the short term for little benefit.

      It’s important to know that’s where the argument “it would cost me more” comes from. That way you can persuade more effectively.

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an edit. The original has one guy saying 6, the other saying 9, because the creator naively thought “oh the political divide is really just down to people not understanding each other”. This is a fairly common opinion of dipshit american centrists.

      The edited version points out how this is incorrect, and that in reality different people have entirely different political views which cannot be reconciled. The example used is that rich people (the same ones that make up the US government and receive bribes from health insurance companies, for instance) want to keep making money from predatory health insurance and so oppose universal healthcare, while the average citizen supports universal healthcare.

      • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It isn’t just fucking poor people. It’s paying out the ass to fuck poor people. Are they so committed to their principles that they wouldn’t want to save a ton of money?

        • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The actual rich who control our society aren’t paying out the ass, they’re the ones being paid.

          Rank and file “working class” conservatives are deliberately poorly educated and fed endless propaganda to get them to vote against their interests and in favor of the rich.

          Conservatives of moderate wealth, the “middle class” of small business tyrants and boat salesmen, live in constant abject terror of losing what they have. They know that if wealth were distributed equally, their quality of life would go down. As a result, they fight against any change towards redistribution of wealth, even if it would be beneficial.