If AIPAC gets a special ban, then different groups with their own least favorite will ask why we aren’t banning that one, and billionaire owned media will say the DNC supports that.

The only logical solution that doesn’t waste a shit ton of time and effort, is to blanket ban all of them at once.

They don’t have infinite time and energy waste on shit. The more individual ones moving, the slower the one that abns everyone moves…

So the dnc released all the information on what was banned to actually help people check if they actually banned pacs and dark money?

The votes that just happened were at the committee level…

After that it goes to all voting members.

Expect a statement after that vote.

The DNC has released nothing about either, because they never do until after the full vote.

Like, I think your confusion is you think the DNC was making any announcements about this stuff, when it was just the billionaire owned media from CNN to Faux News all “independently” releasing the same stories almost verbatim within minutes of each other.

Can you honestly not see how this is a hot job against the DMC because the people who control the media no longer control the DNC?

Step 1: have monies

that requires a tiny bit of literacy

Literally the opposite of what’s happening here…

But I wouldn’t expect someone that defends AI to be able to realize that, especially if they read OPs post and it seemed logical

It’s just a large demographic…

They need bodies at this point, any bodies.

So they’re aiming at one of the largest demographics for younger generations.

0.01% of video gamers, is more people than 0.01% of all tiddlywinks players.

It doesn’t matter how well it connects, it’s just a large demo that watches a bunch of YouTube videos and will see the ads.

Are all your posts here AI?

They sound like AI trying to sound deep, but it’s just gibberish that usually contradicts itself

"Look, America is founded on free enterprise and capitalism,” said Bill Essayli, the first assistant United States attorney for the central district of California, during the press conference. “Anyone who attacks our values, our way of life, our system, which provides the best goods and services to the most people, we’re gonna come after aggressively.”

Well…

That guy’s a fucking idiot

No rationale person believes any of that shit.

Oh, yeah, it’s clearly against rule 3 and will probably be removed soon

Obviously not…

But I’m saying whether she runs or not, it literally doesn’t matter.

Because she has no chance of winning even a single delegate, just like her last attempts.

I don’t know how to make it any clearer

Intertanko is saying this…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Association_of_Independent_Tanker_Owners

They’re third party shippers and if tankers have to pay, that’s their profits.

But the oil companies are gonna pay it anyways, be ause they get the increased profits from the price of oil.

It literally doesn’t matter if she does…

She’s never been able to get a single delegate in a primary, and the current DNC isn’t going to just hand it to someone.

…

It’s not embarrassing to still be using any Meta product?

It’s like being worried because you recognized the guy in front of you at the checkout line at the dildo emporium as your priest…

It would be awkward if he turns around, but he’s got a shopping cart of dildos too, how is he gonna judge?

Science doesn’t care about obvious, it cares about provable fact.

And loads of people all over the world survive longer than 6 hours at higher temps…

You should be made at the author for assuming humans can’t survive what they’ve been surviving longer than the author has been alive, regardless of how old they are.

If your first reaction to this sort of thing is “I did this and I’m fine”,

“This sort of thing” meaning:

The absolute limit for humans to survive

It’s obviously not the absolute limit, because loads of people survive it every day.

An operating steam engine room is not the harshest environment on the planet.

Next time you don’t understand something, try asking questions instead of getting belligerent about it tho.

When people do explain shit, it’s usually as a final reply before blocking.

Then who’s going to answer your inevitable follow up questions?

I cant tell if those are rhetorical questions because you’re upset…

Or if you genuinely don’t understand why the oligarchs are mad kids aren’t having babies…

At the same time, people drastically overestimate how big of a deal it would be…

Someone could always just stop buying games on there.

And if it did “go away” and people lost their games, they think how much they’ve spent on games over decades, and not how much it would cost to replace what they still play.

Out of all the real life horrible shit going on, very few people have the longevity of Valve as a priority.

It’s not 100% safe but at this point it’s more likely to be here in 20 years than the country it’s based in.

But besides all that, I don’t think you know what the word “monopoly” means if you think steam is one.

DNC Chair Ken Martin touted a resolution passed on April 9 that condemns the “corrosive influence” of dark money on Democratic primaries but does not single out AIPAC or any other specific interest group.

“We had various resolutions that focused on different industries and groups, and instead of going one-by-one, we passed a blanket repudiation,” Martin said on social media, adding that he supports an end to dark money in politics.

Instead of just banning AIPAC by name, they’re going after all the PACs.

For those of you who just started paying attention to politics, AIPAC isnt Israel’s first attempt. The last one had to register as a foreign agent, and AIPAC showed up immediately to replace it’s predecessor.

Ban just AIPAC, and a PAC that’s exactly the same but with a new name shows up and does the same shit.

I understand why billionaire owned media pretends to not understand that, but it’s very depressing that voters seem incapable of realizing it unless a millionaire paid by a billionaire tells them

The absolute limit for humans to survive had been assumed to be a six-hour exposure to a wet bulb temperature of 35C (95F)—a measure that accounts for temperature and humidity but has rarely been observed on the planet at that level.

I don’t know who was making that assumption, but they obviously never went into a steam engine room before…

Like, obviously it’s terrible for you and you can’t do any physical activity, but I was 6 hours on, six hours off, in 110-120 wet bulb.

But when scientists applied a new model of human survivability that takes into account the body’s ability to function and stay cool depending on age, they found all six events had seen nonsurvivable periods for older people who could not find shade.

Fucking obviously the elderly are going to handle this worse, they handle everything worse.

Maybe there’s decent science somewhere, but this article is garbage

They’re all gonna start claiming they have “too good to release” versions…

Because everything they release sucks.

But if they never let anyone not financially invested even see the “good one” then no one can say it’s actually shit.

It doesn’t matter if it works, it matters if it raises stock price. So eventually we’ll see them just not release it, it could only hurt the stock price.

Netflix had an amazing show about that, but cancelled it like a week after season 1 premiered.

https://time.com/7317998/billionaires-bunker-ending-explained/

Tldw:

Billonaires think the world is ending and scamper to a bunker.

Twist is that the world isn’t ending, people fucked over by billionaires decided to stage a fake apocalypse and use AI to impersonate them and steal all their money.

And no one cares about the wealthy outside of immediate family, so no one asks questions.

I think it wasn’t just stealing the money, but immediately using it to actually help people.

I’d love to see his legal defense be:

I threw it at the gate because it was just a message. If I wanted to kill him I’d have _____.

Cuz like…

Realistically throwing a moltov at a (presumably) metal gate isn’t the same as attempted murder.

If I was on a jury, that’d be enough for me to say “not guilty” at least.