Leaked Zoom all-hands: CEO says employees must return to offices because they can’t be as innovative or get to know each other on Zoom::Zoom CEO Eric Yuan discussed the benefits of in-person work in a leaked meeting.

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes… heavily regulated… thats why an entire generation of people live with their parents because housing costs are many orders of magnitude too expensive for them to afford. Yup. That’s a clear sign that the government is putting heavy regulations on the cost and distribution of real estate.

    I’m sorry, but the very premise that in our present society real estate is even lightly regulated is utterly ridiculous on its face value. As is the concept that deregulation will make housing affordable. Letting landlords and capitalists do whatever they want with all property will somehow make property cheaper? People motivated solely by profit will make everything cheaper? No, they will continue to sell property at increased costs so they can increase their profits as they always have.

    • dartos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regulation doesn’t automatically mean better.

      You can make regulations that benefit large real estate corporations and that’s still regulation.

      We have a lot of that in the parts of US. There are rules encouraging landlords to keep high rental rates bc if they lowered it, they’d have to offer that to other renters as well. Many landlords choose to have empty rooms and keep that high rental rate.

    • meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have no clue what zoning does to buildability, do you.

      Hint: insane ass zoning rules are government regulations. You really want revised government regulations.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          And way up this thread was referring to localized laws. And you can force certain changes at higher levels, just gotta be prepared for the lawsuit that follows. State of NJ having a huge issue with affordable housing, and Fair Share basically taking a court ruling and running with it and essentially forcing towns to build, or else.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or Newsom just flat out removing zoning restrictions via state law in Cali.

            What a Chad.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        All people who think more gov controlling everything should do is look at places like Europe where it’s basically impossible to build and family homes are generational things handed down and you live with your parents until they die and hand over the home to you

        • HeReads@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          “look at places like Europe” is the clearest signifier of someone who has never left the States ever in their life.

          In Europe, there are 50 countries, over 150 distinct cultures, wildly different economies and styles of government representing each country, and over 746 million people living within European borders. Of those 746 million, 70% own their own home, compared to 65% of US Americans. Your generalization is absolute nonsense and you should probably not respond so confidently with your opinion.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Europe” isn’t just London and Paris. I did some research on real estate in France and Spain recently and it’s significantly cheaper over there if you aren’t living in a major city. Even cheaper than the rural area in the US I currently live in.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No shit…this happens in small towns as well. I would know my family is from multiple countries in Europe.

            They’re cheaper sure, but you also make far less than in the USA.

            • rambaroo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah you do, but the housing was way more affordable at the same time. You can still make good money in Europe depending on what you do. In the US your income also gets reduced by things like heath insurance that are much cheaper in the EU even including the taxes. And groceries are cheaper in Europe as well.

        • Serdan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s absolutely not true where I live, so maybe be careful with the generalizations.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is literally why housing is so expensive. Local governments (or worse, federal), pass stifling legislation that prevents building, almost always due to localized pressure.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meanwhile in Russia there is opposite problem: too much housing. And there are a lot of regulations.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And all of those regulations are extractive, but in the opposite direction

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, I don’t know where you live and maybe in your country nothing is regulated, but I live in Europe and in most European countries there are excessive building regulations which prohibit new developments. This results in severe stock shortage. And shortage drives the prices up. That’s just a fact.

      The whole problem is created by the government and they’re the only ones responsible.

      • Serdan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I live in Copenhagen, and there are new developments going up every day.

          • Serdan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The point being that Denmark also has regulations…

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Regulations can be different. Some regulations state what the quality of the building should be, but some state that developers can fuck off.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Stock shortage”, lol. Not enough paper being printed causes prices to go up?

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you really that ignorant of the housing market? Zoning regulations are the #1 blocker for new housing being built. More regulation = less housing. Just think about it for half a second.

      Also, more housing = lower cost. Supply and demand, dude.

      • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d argue it’s more the homeowners themselves. They don’t want high density housing built near them because it drives down the value of their house, so it doesn’t get built. Voting records tell that story extremely well.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’d be wrong. Local homeowners don’t vote on new construction. That’s not how any of that works.

          • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Homeowners absolutely have a say in their local elections, and there are many cases where they’ve directly prevented projects from moving towards.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Local homeowners vote on zoning policy tho so he’s basically being correct, just not about the mechanism.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Local homeowners typically vote on representatives who then set local zoning laws. But either way, guess what that’s called? Yep, regulation.