• morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I see. Feels like a missed opportunity on osm to be able to press a point and look for what used to be there

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Personally, I think it’s for the better they remain separate projects for logistical reasons. I also understand why OHM went with CC0 for their license, and it was their (I think correct) choice to make it incompatible with the OSM one.

        I know that’s vague, but mainly, I think OHM is better off not having to worry about OSM shenanigans, while OSM is better off being able not to have to worry about historic preservation.

        • morto@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It could be as simple as keeping the edit history and allowing to rollback to a date. I don’t see the point in not preserving the data