Small sample set aside, the performance differences here are much bigger than I’ve seen in previous linux comparisons. Something has to be off right? Curious if anyone is able to reproduce these results.
Small sample set aside, the performance differences here are much bigger than I’ve seen in previous linux comparisons. Something has to be off right? Curious if anyone is able to reproduce these results.
The main reason to use cachy is not the performance. Its the lack of the absolute cancer that is a normal arch install. But cool that it actually does come with gaming configs that make a difference.
archinstallstraight from the ISO is cancer?Yes, a non graphical installer is inacceptable if you are trying to get normie people to switch to it from windows.
Makes me wonder how it compares to Garuda, which is more gaming-tailored and has a graphical installer.
Garuda suffers from having absolutely dog shit defaults and tools compared to cachy for new Linux users.
Not even talking visuals.
Cachys custom scripts, tools and helpers make Garuda look like a fucking joke from a professionalism standpoint. And makes cachy infinity easier to get going and use day to day for a new Linux user.
Cachyos is about as new user friendly as you can physically get on arch short of SteamOS.
If your an advanced user then both Garuda and cachy might as well be carbon copies. Its just a starting point for us. Everything’s getting fiddled with anyways