I agree, that they are also victims. Ideally they would get the help they need, but realistically thats not happening so we have no choice but distance us from them, lest we become victims too.

The mission can be seen in full here, though obviously you should consider carefully before clicking.

Or what? I might see pixels from a video game.

https://xcancel.com/GTASixInfo/status/2010798891269243103

Except for the mission name and general concept of “roof, gun, tent, crowd” its quite the shit recreation honestly.

One former agent told the Daily Beast that he and his colleagues fear it has become more common for juries not to believe evidence they are presenting to the court.

Thats good to hear. But its not gonna be enough i fear.

“If this situation continues, many of us fear that when the Dems get back in, they will dissolve ICE altogether,” he said. “For those of us who care about the good work ICE has done in the past three decades, that’s a very sad state of affairs.”

Still blaming democrats for the consequences of the things that Trump is doing.

He said individual reports from the public have also “spiked” “a lot” since Good’s shooting. “I’ve had hotel staff sending post-it notes, bar staff sending DHS IDs, and loads of people saying their neighbour is an agent,” he said.

Heartwarming :) May their lives be miserable.

The agent then told me a bit about his own background. Like me, he enlisted straight out of high school, then got out and vowed to get as far away from the violence of the military as possible. Like a lot of veterans, he had trouble assimilating into the civilian world. “After about six months, I was like, ‘These people aren’t like me. I want to be around like-minded people.’ ” He found his way into law enforcement.

This also stood out to me. People ive had discussions with have often tried to argue that the military is not as bad and that ACAB doesnt apply to military veterans. Fuck no. Active military deployment turns people into fucking ghouls that are incompatible with society. Some people turning out well (like the author) is just the exception to the rule.

I do understand, i (apparently most people on here) just think that you are very weird for thinking of them as equal.

I don’t think there’s a moral difference between depicting “victimless” CSAM and CSAM containing a real person. I think they’re both, morally, equally awful.

You called them “morally equally awful”, so yes, that is what you said.

If you seriously think that there is no moral difference between someone being sexually abused and them not being sexually abused then maybe you should be in prison for all our safety.

Its good training for arguing with real life people at least. Because coming up with a good comeback quickly is hard when you have never formulated your thoughts about a subject properly. I think often people misunderstand things at first and then when someone points out their mistake, they realize that they were wrong, but dont want to admit it, so they just double down. I have been that person before too tho…

Arguably still more independent than they would be under Trump rule.

I propose the general rule of thumb: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fuck_around_and_find_out

Im sure there is a proper paper out there somewhere but im lazy :3

Nobody was talking about the “legality”. We are talking about morals. And morally there is major difference.

Yeah but it would still be better to revoke it than not revoke it.

Which they then talk about and point out that victims are absolutely present in this case…

If this is still too hard to understand i will simplify the sentence. They are saying:

“The important thing to talk about is, whether there is a victim or not.”

Yeah cell tower data is private just like your google search history is private. Which means absolutely not private. Also cops can (and do) use fake cell towers to make your phone connect to something that they have live access to.

Good additions, thanks.

Modern phones rotate random MAC addresses

My phone does, but im not sure if normal google/apple phones do by default.

Just revoke her status as a recipient already. She is clearly undeserving of it.

Shitty article. Doesnt even contain the words SIM card or IMEI so it has no business advising people on whats safe to bring to a protest. There is no such thing as cop-proofing a mobile phone unless all wireless modules have been removed. The cops can and do track peoples cell tower signal derived locations and they can log active Wifi/Bluetooth MAC addresses in their vicinity.

As others have said, just dont bring it if you are scared. Consider just using a bodycam or gopro style camera.

That is a lot of text for someone that couldn’t even be bothered to read a comment properly.

Non-consensual porn victimises the person being depicted

This is still true if the porn in question is machine-generated

“Doxxing ICE officers and agents puts them and their families at enormous risk,”

Uhh yeah, thats the point you dingus.