The call, an apparent imitation or digital manipulation of the president’s voice, says, “Voting this Tuesday only enables the Republicans in their quest to elect Donald Trump again.”

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Fortunately only Republicans are stupid enough to listen to their leader when they are told not to vote

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    And the government and the telcos let this shit happen because to fix it would cost rich people money and we can’t have that.

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    I would hope that if people are voting for Biden that they are smart enough to not fall for these kinds of things. I could definitely see Trump supporters falling for something like this if Donald Trump called them, but I hope that Biden supporters are a little smarter.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    It starts… This will be the year to decide if we can have functioning information systems and safe, democratic elections in the emerging age of easy AI manipulation.

    It’s a bad sign that there are no widely, commercially available free tools (from governments or otherwise) to help us confirm the validity of these things. We likely need something as ubiquitous as “googling” to stand against the incoming avalanche of truly fake information.

    There will be elections across the globe this year to truly test humanity. I’m hopeful, but I fear we aren’t close to ready. Think about what you would do if you suspected a political manipulation was AI generated today? That’s one aspect, and you’re on Lemmy so you’re likely a bit more capable with technology generally (and you probably still don’t know what to do). Now, think about your grandmother in Milwaukee… what will she do?

  • Balthazar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t get it. How does a message telling Democrats not to vote help Republicans in the primary?

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think this is the reason:

      New Hampshire holds closed primaries, which means Democrats and Republicans can only vote in their own party’s primaries. But independent voters, those who are not affiliated with either party, can vote in either primary — and they make up nearly 40 percent of New Hampshire’s electorate.

      • Balthazar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        So really, independent voters who lean left are being encouraged to stay home. Presumably this helps the far-right candidate.

        • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s to throw off Nikki Haley winning the nomination. She’s VERY popular in NH. I’m up there playing in the snow and ice every weekend and see a more NH than Trump signs.

          • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            This is definitely a plausible explanation but I’m trying to figure why those people would listen to Joe Biden

            • ImTryingLemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              10 months ago

              They are (I) voters that are likely to vote (D) in the general and there is a serious attempt to ratfuck Trump in NH by getting these left leaning (I) voters to vote Haley in the ® primary.

              So… this fake robocall is an Uno reverse card ratfuck trying to get those people to stay home.

    • Shalakushka@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      If we had those sorts of standards for posting on Lemmy, we wouldn’t be able to get super cogent viewpoints like yours, though!

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        it amuses me that the OC is… suggesting something that would probably be used to disenfranchise his rights.

        We should outlaw stupidity in congress. pitch it to both sides as letting them arrest the other. Then arrest both sides and start from scratch.

    • osarusan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s a tragedy that we let people who are borderline retarded cast ballots at all.

      You deserve to get lambasted for that. That’s a horrible thing to say.

      The very core of democracy is the idea that individuals have the right to make choices in how they live their lives, and that the power to govern derives from the consent of the government. What you’re saying is that there’s an arbitrary line of intelligence below which you don’t accept someone’s ability to consent, and you deny their right to make choices about their lives.

      I think that’s the tragedy here.

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s already the case. If someone is deemed to be mentally unfit (retarded is NOT a slur it is legitimately a medical term and you people are too sensitive), they cannot vote. It’s ALREADY a thing.

    • techt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      To clarify a point I don’t think the people replying have specifically pointed out enough already: this line of thinking is contrary to a representative democracy. If some people aren’t worthy of voting, then they aren’t worthy of being represented by their government (e.g. slaves, felons, children). That’s the main disagreement I have with that idea.

      If you truly believe there’s a measurable line for intelligence/competence below which people shouldn’t vote, are you worried there are so many people in that group that it would affect the outcome? If that’s true, then don’t they deserve representation? This problem is solved if everyone votes. Shouldn’t we just try to educate people instead of creating another marginalized group?