We’ve known that the iPhone is switching to USB-C for a while now, but there was always a possibility that Apple would stick with Lightning for one more year. Based on the latest leaked images, however, Apple is all-in on USB-C for the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Pro models, with USB-C parts for the iPhone 15, iPhone 15 Plus, and iPhone 15 Pro Max all shown in a leaked image by X user fix Apple.

With the switch to USB-C, nearly all of Apple’s devices will have adopted the new standard, with only AirPods, Mac accessories, and the iPhone SE remaining aside from older iPhones and the 9th-gen iPad.

  • CleoTheWizard@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It makes them a very small amount of money. But they’ve also been rumored to be making iPhones use a “Made for Apple” type of cable for faster charging speeds. I think that would be really dumb but here we are.

    • Rootiest@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least then there will be no more confusion over who’s fault it is when your iPhone doesn’t charge as fast as you’d like.

      It’s always been Apple’s fault, but now there will be no more saying it’s because Lightning is somehow better.

      • CleoTheWizard@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll give them some fairness. When lightning originally launched, it was a great interface for lightweight power delivery and was more sturdy than the deplorable micro USB. I can’t explain just how bad microUSB is. So it made sense. I think USB-C just put in the legwork to be a much better adapter.

        Also the giant plot hole missing here is that Apple sits on the USB forum I believe and so has some say in what the billions of devices they produce use to charge. They just can’t make money off of a standard now.

          • 🦘min0nim🦘@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well my anecdote is that every single micro USB device I have has either a stuffed port or stuffs the cable. Those things are so incredibly flimsy.

            • snowbell@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I hate microUSB so much. I always feel like I have to treat microUSB ports like fine china or they will break on me. That nervous anticipation every time you plug something in that this will be the time it finally breaks. Too bad mini USB ports had that problem with getting loose over time.

    • moitoi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      making iPhones use a “Made for Apple” type of cable for faster charging speeds

      They can’t do that. The iPhone must comply with PD.

      • ArtificialLink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes they can. Its just all about labeling. They can label a cable that fits to the standard and say “made for apple”

        • moitoi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, the regulation isn’t just usb-c, it’s usb-c and power delivery. Apple can’t magically escape both of them with a “made for apple” cable. It must accept all third party cable and charger.

          • Rootiest@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Of course they can:

            USB -PD support at limited speeds.

            A proprietary Apple chip enables higher speeds, either using USB-PD still or another proprietary charging protocol.

            They can just have both

            • Oneser@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              As I commented above, the regulation clearly states “any additional charging protocol allows for the full functionality of PD… irrespective of the charging device used.”

              So they can’t have both unless they split EU & RoW devices.