Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoToxic Masculinitylemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square140linkfedilinkarrow-up11.36Karrow-down134
arrow-up11.33Karrow-down1external-linkToxic Masculinitylemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square140linkfedilink
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoReally, Rule 2 should be enough. Inanimate objects can’t give consent.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoIt’s future proofing for when fuckable robots are a thing.
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agoEh, I’ll worry about that if and when we get to that point. Who knows, maybe they turn out really fuckable.
minus-squareGloomy@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 months agoThe Hierarchies by Rob Anderson explores this concept trough the eyes of a sex robot. Just in case you ever wondered what a word with realy fuckable robots would look like.
Really, Rule 2 should be enough. Inanimate objects can’t give consent.
It’s future proofing for when fuckable robots are a thing.
Eh, I’ll worry about that if and when we get to that point. Who knows, maybe they turn out really fuckable.
The Hierarchies by Rob Anderson explores this concept trough the eyes of a sex robot. Just in case you ever wondered what a word with realy fuckable robots would look like.
Tell that to a dildo
Yours can talk?
…yours can’t?