• palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 天前

    Given it’s JavaScript, which was expressly designed to carry on regardless, I could see an argument for it returning NaN, (or silently doing what Perl does, like I mention in a different comment) but then there’d have to be an entirely different way of concatenating strings.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 天前

      expressly designed to carry on regardless

      I’m surprised they didn’t borrow On Error Resume Next from Visual Basic. Which was wrongly considered to be the worst thing in Visual Basic - when the real worst thing was On Error Resume. On Error Resume Next at least moved on to the next line of code when an error occurred; On Error Resume just executed the error-generating line again … and again … and again … and again …

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 天前

        You’re right. I’ve got too much Perl on the brain and forgot my roots. There is a language that does what you’re talking about with the ‘+’ operator: BASIC

        Good luck getting the same thing retrofitted into JavaScript though. I can imagine a large number of websites would break or develop mysterious problems if this (mis)behaviour was fixed.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 天前

          I don’t think there’s a way to retrofit JS - but php versions are deprecated all the time. Why not do the same with client-side script versions? :)