einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 个月前ultimate storage hacksh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up1906arrow-down125
arrow-up1881arrow-down1external-linkultimate storage hacksh.itjust.workseinfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 个月前message-square91linkfedilink
minus-squarebarsoap@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 个月前Because PATH_MAX is? Also because it’s a 4k page. FILENAME_MAX is not safe to use for buffer allocations btw it could be INT_MAX.
minus-squareBrahvim Bhaktvatsal@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkisiZuluarrow-up1·4 个月前Thanks! Got an answer and not 200 downvotes. This is why I love Lemm-Lemm.
Because PATH_MAX is? Also because it’s a 4k page.
FILENAME_MAX is not safe to use for buffer allocations btw it could be INT_MAX.
Thanks! Got an answer and not 200 downvotes. This is why I love Lemm-Lemm.