• AugustWest@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 minutes ago

    Back in the day I just assumed everyone was lying. Or trying to get people worked up, and we called them trolls.

    Learning how to ignore the trolls, and not having trust for strangers on the internet, coupled with the ability to basically not care what random people said is a lost art.

    Somehow people forgot to give other the people this memo, including the “you don’t fucking join social networks as your self”. Anonymity makes this all work.

    Eternal September newbies just didn’t get it.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It depends on what communities you subscribe to. You’re not going to get much hostility in a gardening sub, but you will get it in political sub. With that said, my reddit score is very polite. Always has been. My secret is being aware of my emotions and not responding when I’m being egged.

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      Did you even check to see if that ivy you planted is invasive? You’re probably ruining your local ecosystem you piece of shit.

      Also what kind of basic bitch plants basic Roma tomatoes? Garbage choice, when Purple Cherokee are so much better.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    This fits with our understanding of personality disorders, which is that they are a small percentage of our society—around 10.5 percent, according to the recent DSM-5-TR.3

    Idk, I consider 10% to be pretty high. If you add in selection bias, you could get an actual majority in a community having personality disorders just because the non-jerks largely self-select themselves out.

    That said, I still think the conclusions here shouldn’t be taken at face value. The data was from surveys, and while I haven’t read their methodology, I would certainly hesitate to accept results of a survey for something like this (and for <10k responses). I personally find I’m more confrontational online, though I hope I’m generally still way more respectful than your common jerk.

    The results are certainly interesting though.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    No, we’re just done with things like the orange man nazis, advertising, paywalls, borders, illegal for thee but not for me billionaires.

    Bit once that’s fixed we’ll go back to clicking on links to help prince Abu Abowah of Nigeria to settle his bank account once and for all.

  • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Not according to my Reddit user score and perhaps Lenny’s if there is one. Have not looked yet. So not all. I really just like the add to the discussion and help others where I can.

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I am hostile to those that relish in cruelty to others. To those that engage in cringe culture, or bully others for just wanting to live their lives without harming anyone.

    I’ll accept people getting heated and passionate, but I will never accept cruelty, or worse: self-righteous cruelty. Believing someone needs to be ‘punished’ for some slight and so anything is justified against them.

    Basically KiwiFarms and the whole lolcow industrial complex can go fuck themselves.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    IMO online commenters are increasingly showing pathological binary thinking - the attitude that there are exactly two sides to every issue - the Right one and the Wrong one. Questioning ANY aspect of the Right one means you’re obviously a hardcore supporter of EVERY aspect of the Wrong one. You’re either morally and ethically pure or your character is a wretched hive of scum and villainy. To me it’s a really paradoxical way of thinking about diversity and acceptance - more like we’re supposed to either wholeheartedly embrace people or despise them.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s not new, it happened a lot on Reddit, and I get a bit of that in real life too.

      People are tribalist, and that sucks.

      For example, if you read Lemmy comments without any real world experience, you’d think everyone who voted for Trump hates brown people and wants poor people to die. But I have family and close friends who voted for that douchebag, and they are good people, they just thought he’s a better option (and they generally don’t follow politics too much). And I don’t blame them, Harris had a crappy campaign, basically promising the same bad policies Biden had, and Clinton before her was worse. Why should they be interested in politics if we keep getting poor options?

      People aren’t black and white. Yet we caricaturize them as such.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah. I see a surprising amount of it on Lemmy. It is behavior I’m used to seeing from the far right, Qanon, and other brainwashed vectors. I watched the Russians propagandize the right on Reddit.

      These, however, are nominal leftists engaging in stark black and white thinking. I’m not sure if they’re state level shills, bots, really believe it and are brainwashed tankies, or true believers living in China or similar. Maybe it’s dumb kids being taken in by propaganda.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Calling the binary thinkers leftists or shills of some other thing is just another form of simplistic binary thinking - put a black hat on them and boom, you’re done. I think this is a lot of people’s way of dealing with the constant firehose of information we think we have to process because it’s in our endless feeds. We have an always full inbox, and some of us deal with that by processing each item as fast as possible, using minimal thought to tell ourselves we’ve got it figured out so we can swipe on it and scroll on to the next issue. This is leading to a pattern of superficial snap judgements, stereotyping, and ultimately various forms of social bigotry.

        • Machinist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          The point I’m driving at is that they are spouting leftist talking points but have cranked up the fervor to 11. It’s frothing at the mouth type behavior and it genuinely confuses me as to if that is a real viewpoint or a shill. I’m not making a binary snap judgment, I’m questioning if that’s even a real person and what happened to them if they are real.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I think it’s more dumb kids than anything.

        I try to correct it where I can because hopefully a handful will reconsider their stance and grow as a person, but they certainly won’t admit to it.

  • Geodad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    IMO, the reason is because scientists haven’t found a way to punch someone in their face over the internet yet.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’ve long thought that phones needed a taze button. Every telephone in the world should have the power to deliver a high power electric shock to the user, and the phone network should only allow the callee to taze the caller. So if you call someone, the person you have called can taze you.

      I don’t see any problem with the telephone network that can’t be solved by putting a 30,000 volt potential across the caller’s jaw. Make it work on call bots too, if a computer automatically calls you and you don’t want it to, put Shearon Harris on the line. Modern problems require 2nd Amendment solutions, and if you elect me as your president in 2028 it is these policies that I shall energetically enact.

      • Geodad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I like to carry an air horn for when scammers and other nuisances call.

            • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Dang! Some decent hardware then! How bout your own hearing? Getting tinnitus yet? What level of hearing protection are you using?

              • Geodad@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 hours ago

                I’m an old Army veteran, I’ve had tinnitus for years. I’m using a Pixel.

                • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Sorry, pardon?

                  Never even fiddled around with someone else’s Pixel, how do you like it?
                  Clearly it deals with being blasted by an air horn 3-15+ times a day, other than robust mics how is the build quality?

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    the platforms see it as lucrative, therefore its hating eachother time.