Philip Morris Companies, the tobacco giant behind Marlboro, owned Lunchables for 23 years and used cigarette research strategies to shape the brand.

  • Internal documents show Philip Morris shared scientists, technology, and product development methods across its tobacco, food, and alcohol divisions, with Lunchables serving as a model example of that strategy.
  • Lunchables was engineered to appeal to kids’ desire for autonomy and to ease mothers’ guilt, using the same consumer psychology approach Philip Morris developed for cigarettes.
  • Researchers say tobacco-style regulations, including warning labels, taxes, and restrictions on child-focused marketing, may be worth applying to ultraprocessed foods like Lunchables.
  • ZeroCool@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lunchables was engineered to appeal to kids’ desire for autonomy and to ease mothers’ guilt, using the same consumer psychology approach Philip Morris developed for cigarettes.

    I loved lunchables. FUCK!

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They were quick easy meals to pack for your kid but the nutritional value was suspect.

  • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s crucially important to raise kids with an understanding of whole food and its importance. You can’t keep them from processed food, but you can make it clear it’s a sometimes choice. Once they’re an adult and start to care about their health, they can build on the whole food foundation you gave them.

    But God, so many of us were just raised on whatever came out of a box or packet or tube.

  • Astronut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can squeeze shit into a food shape and some sumbitch will eat it that’s for ding dang sure!

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They could have used all that research and knowledge to make something of good quality that would ease a mothers busy work day,and be healthy and nice for kids

    But of course we just went with the “fuck the kids, we found a way to earn a few more cents by feeding those critters some toxic shit”

  • Betch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Anybody else nocticing an increase in ‘cigarette content/advertising’ these days?

    • thejml@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seriously? No. I don’t think I have seen a cigarette ad in 20+yrs. Haven’t seen a vape one in a probably decade either.

      • Betch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well I’m not really talking about traditional advertising either. More of the viral and algorithmic kind.