There’s a lot of “these allegations will be proven false in court” going on in this article.
My dude, there’s DNA evidence. What allegations are there to disprove??
And why does it matter that it was before he worked at your clinic?? Like if someone had been found to be groping patients or stealing at their last identical job, there’s no reason to be concerned they might have continued to do so while they worked for you?? No ‘we’ll look into this and be sure nothing untoward happened’??
“This was before he worked with us, and now we have safeguards in place, by which we mean we’re aware he’s a pervert and we watch him like a hawk, or whatever legal equivalent will absolve us of any wrongdoing for providing him with a target rich environment in exchange for the prestige.”
This DNA evidence isn’t exactly CSI-quality:
Bester, 42, said she received DNA results from Ancestry.com and 23andMe as she explored her history earlier this year.
The results didn’t show a direct match to Berger but identified a granddaughter and second cousin of his.
Results from self-test family ancestry companies are questionable at best.
Proving paternity will require a forensic DNA test of the alleged father.
Bet she isn’t the only one.
