• 1 Post
  • 433 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle
  • I know a lot of FOH engineer that can design an array hang, dial in delays, do crazy sub array stuff, manage a Dante network, AND make a band sound good.
    They are quite comfortable as FOH, systems, monitors RF or even just a patch monkey.

    Just because a lot of people that call themselves sound engineers can’t do that, doesn’t mean nobody is a sound engineer.
    I get that engineer is a protected term, but the majority of those apply to disciplines that have been around for centuries not 70 decades.

    Original sound engineer would make their own kit. So they were probably electrical engineers, applying their knowledge to sound.

    Be an audio tech. That’s cool. I’d rather be on a gig with someone I consider a sound engineer tho.




  • It’s not difficult to define.
    It’s about people’s choices.

    People can choose to own a gun, choose to want to own a gun, choose to own a whole armoury.
    I think owning a gun is stupid. I live in a country that successfully regulates guns.
    Saying “I think gun owners are stupid” isn’t hate speech because they have chosen to own a gun.
    If I said “gun owners should use their guns in themselves” that becomes hate speech because it’s wishing harm on them.

    People choose to be Republicans, trumps choices in life are why he is where he is.
    Hate trump because of what he does, not because he has blonde hair.

    People don’t choose to be gay, or be trans, or be Jewish, or be black, or be short or whatever.
    Which is another way opinions can become hate speech.
    If I said “I think gun owners are stupid” that isn’t hate speech.
    If I said “I think black people are stupid” that becomes hate speech because it is grouping people by something they have no control over.





  • 4 years ago (best number I can find, considering IAs blog pages are down) IA used about 50 petabytes on servers that have 250 terabytes of storage and 2gbps network.
    From this, we can conclude that 1 TB of storage requires 8mbps of network speed.
    Let’s just say that average/all residential broadband has spare bandwidth for 8mbps symmetrical.
    We would need 50,000 volunteers to cover the absolute minimum.
    Probably 100k to 200k to have any sort of reliability, considering it’s all residential networking and commodity hardware.

    In the last 4 years, I imagine IA has increased their storage requirements significantly.
    And all of that would need to be coordinated, so some shards don’t get over-replicated





  • If only that was the government that invested in the R&D and tech to make it happen.
    Gaining funds from taxes (meaningful taxes), and investing that money in making their country better.

    Hopefully this decision is because carbon taxes that will make consumer products representative of the actual cost of the item (not the exploitative cost). >

    No no, let the free market decide.
    Fucking AI threatening to replace basic jobs (when it’s more suited to replace the C-Suite) gobling up energy and money, too-big-to-fail bailouts and loophole tax rules bullshit.

    So yeh, someone needs to spend the money and that should be the government.
    Because they should realise that carbon fuel sources are a death sentence.


  • I agree, and it is possibly the only good thing to come out of AI.
    Like people asking “why do we need to go to the moon?!”.

    Fly-by-wire (ie pilot controls decoupled from physical actuators), so modern air travel.

    Integrated circuits (IE multiple transistors - and other components - in the same silicon package). Basically miniaturisation and reduction in power consumption of computers.

    GPS. The Apollo missions lead to the rocket tech/science for geosynchronous orbits require for GPS.


    This time it is commercial.
    I’d rather the power requirements were covered by non-carbon sources. However it proves the tech for future use.

    For a similar example, I have a strong dislike of Elon Musk. He has ruined the potential of Twitter and Tesla, but SpaceX has had some impressive accomplishments.

    Google are a shitty company. I wish the nuclear power went towards shutting down carbon power.
    But SOMEONE has to take the risk. I wish that someone was a government. But it’s Google. So… Kind of a win?




  • I don’t think smart phones are conventional communications. The are smart. They are still the “tech of tomorrow”.
    Smart phones use conventional communications to do very clever things. But those clever things are range limited and require specialised equipment. They also have absolutely no “hackability” without specialised equipment (easy to get, sure… But still pretty much single purpose)

    AM is literally a couple caps, inductors, resistors (edit: and diode) then an amplifier (a couple transistors and resistors). And the range of lower frequency radio waves is (or can be) phenomenal.
    It’s just that it takes some experience to operate on these frequencies, and their bandwidth is limited.

    Smart phones do away with the experience requirements, and trade higher frequencies & higher data rates for range (and I guess trade digital encoding for simplicity)

    I see parallels to software.
    People are nervous to “side loading apps” on their phone, but have no issues downloading and installing an exe on windows.
    Smart phones give you the “this is how” kind of experience, and abstract away the sheer amount of technology they leverage. Which is amazing, and is what makes them smart!
    But the underlying technology is phenomenal. And I feel it’s a shame that the majority of people don’t have any understanding of “installing an app” or similar (like calling internet access “WiFi”… 2 distinct things!)