deleted by creator

Yeah, I definitely remember when they started showing things I didn’t ask for, and I thought “I don’t like that”, but I stuck around because I could ignore posts I didn’t care about.

It took a little while, but I eventually started to play “how far can I scroll before I get something I didn’t ask for?”

Shortly after that, I realized I actually had to start playing “how far until I get something I did ask for?”.

Once I realized that, I cut back significantly. I still go from time to time when I’m stuck waiting in line or something, but it broke my daily habit. I miss what it used to be, but I certainly don’t miss what it is.

“Roe v. Wade is settled law. They just use the issue to rile up their base. They’d never overturn it!” and other lies we tell ourselves…

Keep in mind that many red states have attempted to essentially ban online porn with their overbearing age-verification laws. A savvy internet user would be less likely to pick an exit node in a red state, given the choice.

More like SkiBilly Bass

So, if I grab an item off the shelf and browse around the store for a while, is the price going to be the price currently displayed or the price when I grabbed it?

If it’s the current price, what’s the point of a price tag? If I can’t actually know the price until checkout, then showing me the price is kind of a useless bit of data. I also suspect that the “speak to a manager” types would make that a major headache for stores.

If it’s the price when I grabbed it, how are they keeping track of that? I see two ways of handling that: one requires that you use their app to shop, and the other requires cameras and “machine vision” that are still unreliable, at best. The former seems more likely, but I doubt either is going to sit well with customers.

Edit: someone pointed out that it might not actually display a price, and you’d have to scan it to get your price. Kind of like the first option, but I think it’s going to turn off less tech savvy customers.

I haven’t seen that aspect addressed in any articles about the “feature”.

deleted by creator

Both is good

Well, you could do the 31st of April, but it seems the universe disagrees with your date format.

The idea of “standing” has never really sat right with me.

“Sure, the law seems pretty unconstitutional, but until it actually hurts someone, why should we fix it?”

Maybe because you have the power to fix a bad thing.

Did you put your name in the goblet of forgiveness?

It could be worse…

What a creative solution to a problem! Just like a silly goose!

That’s the Mildly Infuriating part, right?

As far as I can tell from the ridiculously tiny thumbnail I have cached, it’s a screenshot of this post about renaming billionaires to “wealth-hoarders”, followed by a post about a news article regarding starving children as a result of war-induced famine in Gaza.

Edit: well, it looks like the error has been resolved.

There was a period of a few years where I did not have insurance. I’m a pretty healthy person, so I figured the risk was acceptable. The few times I did need to go to the doctor, when I told them I did not have insurance and would be paying out of pocket, they adjusted the prices for me automatically.

I thought it was ridiculous, even then, but I wasn’t going to complain about getting a reasonable price, obviously.

Sorry, the best I can do…

This kills the llama.

Murderer…

The 85-year-old actor will “make a speedy and full recovery” and is in “good spirits,” his spokesperson said.

• NBC News

Glad to hear it!

Like a Safety coffin for Sarah O’Bannon.