space_comrade [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 47 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 11th, 2020

help-circle


  • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.nettoLinux@lemmy.mlHow to quit VIM?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Just switch to VSCode or something similar, it has enough features and shortcuts that will quickly make you like at least 80% as productive as you were in Vim. It even has a Vim mode so you can wean yourself off of it more easily.

    Honestly never got the appeal of Vim, you need to spend so much time learning and configuring it only to squeeze out a little bit of extra productivity out of it when compared to a “normal” editor/IDE. I don’t see why it’s so important to be able to edit and write code as quickly as possible since most of the time you’re going to be debugging or looking at the code or reading docs.

    EDIT: Just noticed you said you don’t code a lot. I think most of what I said still applies, I imagine you don’t spend 99% of the time in the editor typing away.














  • I don’t like VMs because I need to allocate memory upfront for it, and considering it’s a Windows VM and depending on the dev work you’re doing on it you might need to give it 10Gb+.

    If it’s at all possible for OP I’d recommend getting a separate physical workstation and then just remoting into it with your Linux machine, if you use VSCode the process is pretty much seamless, you use VSCode from your Linux machine normally while all the work is being done on the remote machine.




  • Damn you’re a complete grating asshole, I’m not reading all of that shit but I do know at least this is wrong:

    You’re not going to find anyone actually employed in quantum theory or research espousing it.

    Eugene Wigner, John von Neumann, Roger Penrose, Brian Josephson, Henry Stapp, Erwin Schrödinger (debatable, but he was questioning physicalism).


  • I do not have to provide you with definitions so that your stupid ideas make sense.

    Damn you’re a feisty one.

    In fact you do have to provide definitions, an “observation” in the context of quantum mechanics does not have a consensus definition and the definition heavily relies on your particular interpretation of quantum mechanics. One of these interpretations also includes consciousness, and if you want to be completely certain this particular interpretation is false you need your own coherent definition of consciousness that doesn’t call upon quantum mechanics. You don’t have such a thing, nobody does.

    You’re locked in a belief system and you don’t even realize it.