That’s a rather obvious and expected move in my eyes. After all, they had setup themselves for deep AI integration with their processor changes about a decade ago already. I was wondering for a while why they never really played their hand so far. Siri was not the epitome of that development.
And here I was merely wondering how they changed the counting rules.
And probably get it.
Ah, so he goes with the state of the art. That’s reassuring. Good.
Correctly used AI is a great leverage for small companies.
Of course they would expect all that. After all they have listened to tech bro CEOs for years now that AI will solve all of this.
Oh the value was proven as of summer this year. But in public perception, AI still means chat littered with hallucinations.
Want some tulips? I can ship you some in 2 months time. Better buy now, to be sure you are the one who gets them.
If you are developing software with financial impact, and every developer downloads their dependencies from the internet without further checks, you already have set up yourself for desaster.
If you would ask a LLM for how to guard yourself against malicious dependencies, this would be one of the first things they’d point out.
You see, this is actually the fault of the now dead people. They immediately haunt the poor officials and their technology as ghosts.
/s just to make it clear, because internet.
So this judge now defaults to suspecting perjury.
But but … These are effective altruists who due to their great technology will better theblifes of billions and trillions of people who are not even born yet, or so they say.
Catastrophes don’t need to kill everyone to still be considered catastrophic. D’uh. Remarkable insights.
Air conditioning alone will not hold off the water from the coast metropolis, where something like 50% of the world population will have to relocate.
Not possible. This will be a precedence. But Republicans will not view it as precedence that someone is held accountable for criminal actions, rather than persecution of the political opponent is fine.
Isn’t it obvious he will say they modeled it after his version?
As windows user you primarily learn to interrupt your work at any time for a mandatory software update
Good. Let them discover early in their lives that we do not need to depend on big tech companies.
So this is the end? I object to a Holocaust comparison, and that make you leave the discussion? I don’t know why you need to balance large scale crimes against humanity out against each other. To me each is a ultimate failure of humans, and each is singular in their mechanics. The Nazis had perfected the industrialized mass killing, which makes the Holocaust somewhat unique among genocides. That doesn’t make other genocides being not-genocide or something, but the comparison also just doesn’t cut it. If anything it serves to make one wonder if you are among those who trivialize the Holocaust.
I stated multiple times that I disagree with Netanyahus treatment of the Palestinians and that I want to see him in court for his crimes.
Nevertheless the antizionist movement alltooften throws it all together, matched only by other extremist ideologies. It is extremely one sided in their version of history, uses unreasonable comparisons and arguments in areas where I am somewhat knowledgeable and where I can’t follow.
I hear the accusations, but when they come from antizionists, they’re distinguishable from “Jews are the devil” only by the other word “Zionists”. So how close is it to standard antisemitism?
Netanyahu and his own extremists belong to justice, along with the soldiers that actually do the crimes against humanity. That doesn’t make me any more willing to follow the other extremists.
That procedure is called fascism.